User talk:Guran223

February 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 19:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry takes various forms: You are doing at least one of the above regularly, and have in fact been blocked previously for your disruptive edits. This account is no different. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Per WP:SOCK:
 * Logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address
 * Creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions
 * Using another person's account (piggybacking)
 * Reviving old unused accounts (sometimes referred to as sleepers) and presenting them as different users
 * Persuading friends or colleagues to create accounts for the purpose of supporting one side of a dispute (usually called meatpuppetry)

User:Ponyo I didn't "log out" to avoid detection. My account automatically got logged out while I was writing my text. In fact, I was writing a comment to make sure it was clear that the message was left by me when you blocked me. Im not going to accuse you of malicious intent. But it is very strange behavior on your behalf. Guran223 (talk) 20:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Ponyo or Yamla could one of you please respond? This is not a way to treat members of the community. Guran223 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Yamla There is no confirmed violations of sock. Its ridiculous! I statted a conversation as an IP, I decided to create an account to continue it. And got logged out while writing an answer. There is no sockpuppetry involved. It happens to people all the time on Wikipedia. What craziness is this?Guran223 (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC) bons mots I was blocked for one week for a very strange reason related to the Ukraine conflict where an admin said I was in violation of WP:BIO. You probably don't know what it was because he deleted my edits on talk page. I was going to take this block to ANI since I didn't really do anything beyond mention the content of a Washington Post article on the talk page. I think he mistook me for a pro-Russian troll or something - which Im not. Guran223 (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You have been edit warring and treating Wikipedia as a battleground for months. Even now you're outright denying your previous block was legitimate and that your editing is unproblematic. I don't agree. This edit is not an edit made by someone editing civilly and collaboratively, both of which are required by policy. There is no reason to ping me again.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ponyo I don't know, it seems like a malicious block without a warning based on an accusation you know to be false. I guess its enjoyable for you to abuse your online position this way. Its people like you who are killing Wikipedia. Guran223 (talk) 21:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)