User talk:Gurbar Akaal

Recent edits to Battle of Jamrud
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Battle of Jamrud without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Got it.Thanks

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Battle of Multan
 * added a link pointing to Akali


 * Battle of Nowshera
 * added a link pointing to Maharaja Ranjit Singh


 * Fauj-i-Khas
 * added a link pointing to Kangra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Sikh Khalsa Army page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=726010422 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F726010422%7CSikh Khalsa Army%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Afghan–Sikh Wars
 * added links pointing to Dal Khalsa and Akbar Khan


 * Ranjit Singh
 * added a link pointing to Hazara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mughal-Sikh Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wazir Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Ranjit Singh
Thank you for your edit today of Ranjit Singh. You may have seen this extract from the article on Ranjit Singh in The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism: "The administration of Mahārājā Raṇjīt Siṅgh may be described as a personalized military despotism based on popular will. Designated as the Sarkār Khālsā, it was an absolute centralized monarchy, but liberal and benevolent. Its chief merit was religious moderation and practical efficiency. Though based on military might and sustained by successive victories, it was extremely popular. As absolute monarch, Raṇjīt Siṅgh enjoyed great power which he wielded unhampered for the common weal of all his subjects Hindu, Sikh, Muhammadan and others."

It seems to me that RS can validly be accused of desecrating the Badshahi Mosque, but that he showed considerable tolerance of the different religions in his empire and did not persecute the Muslim community. What is your view? Apuldram (talk) 12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

-Hi Apuldram! Indeed, I agree with you. Sikh rule was peaceful and tolerant. Now, the desecration of the Badshahi Mosque cannot be accused, as you very well said, on RS. The love of justice, the continuous victories and the religious tolerance are all the reason why he is known as Sher-i-Punjab. Some theories cannot replace his grand reputation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Punjab War
You have blanked the page without explanation. I don't know the subject, it's the problem of basic rules - we don't blank pages.Xx236 (talk) 11:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

An Invite to join WikiProject Punjab
Peeta Singh (talk) 10:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Need Help
hi Gurbar Akaal, i need a help from you. In article of Bhagat singh in his early life it has been written " Bhagat singh a sandhu jat" (what thus it means?) it creats a misleading among readers, "Jat" is divided into three categories Sikh Jat, Muslim Jat and Hindu Jat. Bhagat singh was born in a Sikh jat family, when i edited this "Bhagat singh a sandhu sikh jat" there was a revert with the reason that he was an atheist and he never claimed that he was a Sikh. By seeing this point i edit one more time that " he was born in a Sikh jat family (as everyone knows) " and later he had become atheist. Again it is reverted, this edit-revert game (Edit war) was keep on going for several days as a result i was "Blocked". After Block has expired the talk has been started on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh where i come up with a proper reason and sources and they come up with an excuse. they argued that he never claimed he was a sikh (I agree) but he never too claimed that he was jat (only jat). I argued that "Bhagat singh a sandhu jat" means nothing and it is misleading where as we should change by editing that "He was born in a sandhu sikh jat family" but they have not replied till yet.

so i need your help to please support me on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh so that the talk reach its conclusion and change the article as it is misleading. here are the sources that clears that he was born in sikh jat family. Please see

As i mentioned first, the first three source they come up with an excuse that it is a weak source because it is a Newswebsite (but already there are many source from newswebsite mentioned in a Bhagat singh). then i came up with another source which is based on a book and they have not replied yet.

so, i need your help to please come and support me on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagat jit singh (talk • contribs) 11:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mughal-Sikh Wars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mughal-Sikh Wars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mughal-Sikh Wars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lennart97 (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias &#61; expanding information &#38; knowledge&#39; (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)