User talk:Gurpreetsingh56

July 2018
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Sandhawalia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 22:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Maharaja ranjit singh ji caste
Dear sir the source of first maharaja ranjit singh ji  is sandawalia  surname  and sandawalia  surname  is  a  jat sikh  according  to Wikipedia this  article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandhawalia so please update this information  Gurpreetsingh56 (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Maharaja ranjit singh ji caste
Dear sir the according  to

Maharaja ranjit singh ji caste
Dear sir according to this book the maharaja ranjit singh ji is jatt sikh sandhawalia  let's explain  the page numbers-  (172)

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vgixwfeCyDAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=history+of+jatt+sikh&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh9OXmrbcAhUIuI8KHcnYDHQ4KBDoATAAegQIARAD#v=onepage&q&f=false

Please update the information

Maharaja ranjit singh ji caste
Dear sir according  Wikipedia  - sukrachkia  misl create  sardar charat Singh -sardar  charat Singh is a maharaja ranjit singh grand father sukrachkia know  as sandawalia jatt  misl maharaja ranjit singh caste is sandawalia  and sukrachkia misl create is a sardar  charat Singh  and sardar chart Singh is a maharaja ranjit singh grand father  so dear sir it's  relvent point  is maharaja ranjit singh ji is sandawalia jatt https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukerchakia_Misl

Sir read this link

Maharaja ranjit singh caste
Dear sir it's  relents and genuine  information  maharaja ranjit singh ji is a  sandawalia jat  caste  so please  let's me explain  what you  want  any other  type  source  please  let's me explain  the  who' s type  source  I provide you  Gurpreetsingh56 (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Maharaja ranjit singh caste
Dear sir maharaja ranjit singh surme is sandawalia  it's  not changeable  but maharaja ranjit singh caste  jatt so I already  explained  you and send  documents  so please  update  the information  maharaja ranjit  sandawalia jatt  Gurpreetsingh56 (talk) 16:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Ranjit Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Hari Singh Nalwa. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch &#124; talk 19:19, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sikh Rajputs. Jim1138 (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for repeatedly removing sourced content without explanation, as you did at Sikh Rajputs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 11:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ranjit Singh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ranjit Singh was changed by Gurpreetsingh56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865331 on 2018-08-24T17:02:16+00:00.


 * If the bot was able to figure this out, I gather that similar edits were made in the past and they were reverted. Note that the source you have added (twice) does not actually say what you claimed. You cannot do such edits. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ranjit Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vallabhbhai Patel. utcursch &#124; talk 18:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Please don't add poor sources as you did here. You specified pages "90-149-241" as your source, but it doesn't appear that you actually read those pages: you simply searched the book for "Sandhu" and specified the pages that appear in Google Book snippets, without bothering if those pages actually support the content. Also, other user-contributed wikis are not reliable sources. utcursch &#124; talk 14:17, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)