User talk:Gursahilpreet Singh

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man  ( Talk ) 10:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

MOS:TV
Hi there, re: these changes, if you're going to edit TV articles, you should familiarise yourself with MOS:TV, since there is, actually, a Manual of Style for how the community wants its articles to look and be structured. Indian entertainment articles in general are problematic because none of the contributors want to take the time to make quality articles, and they introduce many, many problems, which are then copied across to more and more articles. Adhering to community standards helps to raise the bar for what Indian articles look like.

As an example, there is no justification to create an entirely new set of credits for the second season. Per WP:TVCAST any new additions to the cast would go at the bottom of either the Main or Recurring cast lists. We are not interested in just the current cast, we are interested in the entire history, and we don't need to repeat information. Further, the community prefers either prose or bulleted lists rather than tables. So any deviation from these guidelines would require you to seek a local consensus and argue for why this special formatting is necessary. And, we typically don't create overview tables until the second season has started, since if there are no new episodes, there is no reason to have information about a second season. You might want to take a look at some high-quality TV articles, which you can search for at WP:FA or WP:GA.

Note also that your edit summary, where you call someone dumb, is considered a personal attack, which violates our policy on civility. Please try to keep a level head moving forward. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I went through great efforts to explain community standards to you. This resubmission is disruptive. Seek consensus for the changes you want to implement. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. You keep deviating from MOS:TV for no clear reason whatsoever, most recently here and I don't have the time or inclination to educate you on every mistake that you are making. The community doesn't want cast lists in tabular format, the community doesn't want a new cast member listed at the top of the infobox starring parameter, etc. Ignorance is not a crime, but repeated submission of problematic content after you have been educated, is disruptive. When you are ready to adhere to community standards and start communicating, feel free to request an unblock. But also be sure to read MOS:TV, WP:TVCAST and Template:Infobox television so that you understand how articles should be structured. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)