User talk:Gurumayum Arvind

Soma Laishram
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Soma Laishram, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://e-pao.org/erang/Actress/Soma_Laishram_Profile_in_2014.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Moreh Maru
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Moreh Maru article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moreh Maru


The article Moreh Maru has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * too soon, no claim of notability and no release of film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Moreh Maru for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moreh Maru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Moreh Maru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Andyjsmith. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Moreh Maru because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Please use provide an edit summary whenever possible. -TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Copy and pasting
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Donating copyrighted materials to grant license.

Please do not remove corebot warnings if they are indeed correct. Fix your copyright problem, do not ignore it. Thanks.--Lucas559 (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bala Hijam with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU '' ( talk ) 19:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Soma Laishram


The article Soma Laishram has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 06:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Moreh Maru has been reverted. Your edit here to Moreh Maru was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Moreh) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Mounao Thoibi
Hello, Gurumayum Arvind,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mounao Thoibi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mounao Thoibi.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Chazchaz101 (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mounao Thoibi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surjit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Ta-Tomba the Great
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ta-Tomba the Great, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageSelector.asp?src=TSE_MV_Ta_Tomba&ch=reviews&sub1=movies.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sor (film)


The article Sor (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:TOOSOON at best. Doesn't (yet) meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angangba Mayek


The article Angangba Mayek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:CRYSTAL -- no evidence of release or production by reliable sources. Article on a future film is not appropriate for mainspace without RS coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sor (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sor (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sor (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Angangba Mayek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angangba Mayek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Angangba Mayek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cactus Writer (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angangba Mayek


The article Angangba Mayek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FILMNOT -- no evidence of release, production or significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Article on a future film is not appropriate for mainspace without RS coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Angangba Mayek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angangba Mayek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Angangba Mayek& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Helloy


The article Helloy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, per WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 17:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toro (film)


The article Toro (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, tagged since 2016. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to satisfy WP:NFILM."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ta-Tomba the Great


The article Ta-Tomba the Great has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, tagged since 2016. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search except the one citation already listed, but that isn't enough to help it pass WP:NFILM."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanagi Tangbal


The article Sanagi Tangbal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No reviews found to help this pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since 2016."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sathiba Danger


The article Sathiba Danger has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, tagged. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 05:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)