User talk:Gurvindersingh3878

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   20:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seeds Of innocence Fertility Hospital (March 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seeds Of innocence Fertility Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seeds Of innocence Fertility Hospital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Seeds_Of_innocence_Fertility_Hospital Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Seeds_Of_innocence_Fertility_Hospital reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Seeds Of innocence Fertility Hospital


A tag has been placed on Draft:Seeds Of innocence Fertility Hospital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

COI
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seed of innocence fertility hospital


A tag has been placed on Seed of innocence fertility hospital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 18:20, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for your message. You are correct about the message you need to post, but it goes on your user page, User:. Note the following:
 * You do not own the article, and declaring your paid editor status doesn't mean you can then write what you like. You must write in accordance with the guidance above. If I think that you are failing to do so, I will block you indefinitely as a spammer.
 * Make sure you understand the notability criteria, and that reliable sources exclude anything posted by the hospital and interview with its managers
 * stick to independently sourced facts'. Most of your article was a mixture of unsourced promotional claims and your opinions, not real facts, eg successful in treating 3000+ Infertility patience annually... one of the very leading brands internationally... continuously successful in providing satisfaction to patients from all over 25 countries around the globe&mdash; just a claim with no independent evidence and some puff about how wonderful the hospital is.
 * The lack of wikilinks and references makes it look as if much of the text was copied from somewhere. I didn't check because it was blatant spam anyway, but read the copyright section of my guidance too.
 * Take your time to make sure that you understand the guidance because if your next version, after you have declared your COI, is anything like the last one, you will be blocked. Don't be tempted to edit from a new account to avoid that either.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Gurvindersingh3878/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Last chance
You really aren't trying to conform with our rules. Most of what you have posted is unsourced and is basically pure spam for the hospital, with no real facts. Here is some of the obvious unsourced spam. ''has been successful in treating 3000+ Infertility patience [sic] annually... SOI is one of the very leading brands internationally... SOI has been continuously successful in providing satisfaction to patients from all over 25 countries around the globe... unblemished, pristine and an extremely experienced... two extremely talented founders... have been excelling their field since a long period of time. With their continuous with arduous and a common vision they expanded the Seeds of innocence and have been running it successfully by having 5 centers... Seeds of innocence has been thriving hard and continuously been successful in providing quality treatment to its patients... With continuous determination and a common vision, the staff of SOI has been executing excellent services at a rate of approximately 80%... the warm and friendly environment of the clinic, there Is a sense of calm. We wish to make all the patients stay at ease always...'' and so on, just junk.

If you can't find an independent source, don't say it. If you are repeating what the hospital claims, don't say it. If it's obvious spam like the above don't say it. If it's n opinion, don't say it. If you aren't giving sourced facts, don't say it. You o0bviously haven't even looked at proper articles so you can see what text and references should look like, since your few refs are bare urls and you don't have a single wikilink to other articles like New Delhi in the entire text. Since you approached me before I found this attempt, I'm not going to block you immediately as WP:Not here as I would otherwise have done, but this is your last chance to comply with our rules.

Next time, I'll block this account and any other that edits on this topic. Read the COI section I posted above, and articles like Tesco. Last chance! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)