User talk:Gustave.iii

No reference is given for the data for the maps.

A page you started (Chita distillery) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Chita distillery.

User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 19:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Opinion polling for next UK GE
The whole issue with it is that you are yourself making your own interpretation of what events shift opinion polling, cherry-picking those events and then presenting all of it into an ad hoc chart that only serves to transmit what you are intending it to transmit. Further, this is de facto bypassing already established consensus at Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election on which events to add to the table by adding them through a chart. This is entirely out of place as it constitutes a breach of WP:NPOV and WP:OR (specifically, WP:SYNTH). As it has been said, there is no need for this: proof of it is that there is no other such thing in any other Wikipedia article. Impru 20 talk 21:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British passport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/British_passport check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/British_passport?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alan MacMasters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan MacMasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alan MacMasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mangoe (talk) 23:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Incidents noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Why hasn't he been blocked yet? Patachonica (talk) 22:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Hemiauchenia, @Patachonica, that section should not have been archived away without action; I have now blocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC) If you want to be unblocked, an actual apology/explanation for the creation and maintenance of the hoax article Alan MacMasters and the associated fake photo is needed. Even if it was created as a "joke" back in 2013, you continued to maintain it up to 2021. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Britishpassport UK4.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Britishpassport UK4.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AusLondonder (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)