User talk:Guy Harris/Archives/2015/12

As to the table
No, No,

There still exist so many mistaken information on the table of Mac OS X, wow, you need to correct them, ok?

Best regrads,

your respectful Aaron Janagewen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.210.137.235 (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi. Did I do it right? Do you need to comment? I know nothing but your edit message allegation toward this new user, and the new user's behavior.  Also, why is there a whole mess of gigantic tables in the Talk page? — Smuckola(talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, you did it right
If, on my talk page, "it" in "Did I do it right?" refers to your edits to Sockpuppet investigations/We talk about Mac OS X, yes, you did it right. He's pretty clearly Yet Another Sockpuppet of User:Janagewen - same language style, same obsessions, same level of technical confusion, same style of handle name as other sockpuppets such as User:We talk about PAE, User:We talk about xp, and User:We talk about x64. The investigation is now closed with, not surprisingly, the conclusion that it's another sockpuppet account.

The tables are there because he doesn't like the existing tables, and prefers his tables, with a bunch of extra information of not-exactly-obvious relevance and not-exactly-obvious meaning in some cases.

Thanks! Guy Harris (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah that's what I was referring to and I have reopened the case with his subsequent IP addresses. What a waste of time.  Wow those tables should have been on a sandbox and not a Talk page, but omg the ensuing discussion.  I glaze over pretty fast on it.  Did that have any bearing on reality?  I know Wikipedians love to discuss stuff they know is inane junk in a desperate attempt to validate and enable all viewpoints so that nobody is ever seen as wrong even when they clearly are not only wrong but in need of being chastized and shut down, but how could anyone have ever seriously discussed that much junk?  You're saying it should all just be archived and forgotten, right? Okay thanx. i dunno why on earth you replied to me on a different page, lol... — Smuckola(talk) 18:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, it takes a lot of energy and words to debate with Janagewen; at this point, I've decided to just ignore him on talk pages and undo whatever nonsense he puts on regular pages. Might as well let the archiver get rid of his stuff.


 * (As for replying, I'm not sure what the right protocol is for user talk page discussions; I'm fine with splitting comments between the two user pages or putting them all on one of the pages.) Guy Harris (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, anyway, thank you both for appreciating my works! And what's more I do really appreciate your Mach-Kernel-Message-Passing-Like COROPERATION! For your appreciations, I would make more and more works endlessly! As I said shits are always shits anywhere and anytime, but that is my passion to get rid of shits! You both do really entertain me too a lot! If both of you disappear from wiki, I would get some a sorrow! Anyway, as I said, not matter what you wrote is ok, but try to not mislead our innocent readers. When they know what you wrote is wrong, they would not believe Wikipedia anymore, and you both need to seek other places to lie! Sorry!

Invite
Also you might consider having this page archived by a bot because it's so long. 2002:43F4:3ABB:1234:A4ED:4387:1B01:30CC (talk) 01:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

You're invited to WikiProject Apple Inc.!
Hello, Guy Harris! I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Apple Inc. We work on improving Apple Inc. articles and would appreciate your help. Thanks! 2002:43F4:3ABB:1234:A4ED:4387:1B01:30CC (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)