User talk:Guyarv/sandbox/Architecture of Strasbourg

=Evaluations=

2/28/18 Evaluation by user:Kristinnmason
spelling/grammar: Really great. Language: This looks awesome. Very encyclopedic. Organization: Appropriate headings. Coding: Wonderfully done. Good organization with the quick links to each section heading. Validity: All seems to be valid info. Completeness: Everything meets criteria. Relevance: All relevant. Sources: 10 good sources! Citations: placed appropriately. References: Good references.

You do a wonderful job. I've read through this a few times and enjoyed it each time. I think this will make a fine page and is A quality already. On a side note about the sources, I see that you used the same cite but different pages on that cite. I did the same and I do not think it will count against your grade (if you were concerned about it.)

2/28/2018 Evaluation by user:Avictory
Spelling & Grammar: - both spelling and grammar are perfect. Perhaps "The cathedral was begun in the Romanesque style..." could be modified? While technically grammatically correct, it sounds a bit odd. Language: -good word choice and tone is neutral. Organization: -logical order and good flow between sentences and sections. Coding: -no coding errors. Completeness: -each section looks complete enough. No obvious gaps in content. Perhaps pictures could be added? (I'm sure you're doing that anyway.) Relevance: -all information is relevant and cohesive. Also linked to other articles, which is a plus. Citations: -citations look good. All links opened and sources are legitimate. I know this feedback isn't at all helpful, but regardless, it had to be done. Anyway, perfect as usual.

Avictory (talk) 04:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)