User talk:Guyarv/sandbox/Lucca

=Evaluations=

1/30/2018 Evaluation by User:Kristinnmason
I went through all the criteria and would give you an A if I was calculating a grade. I have only good things to say about your page as far as the coding/sources/citations, etc. I like how you added the two titles to the bottom for further information however it does look incomplete as far as visual editing so I would leave those out until you have more information. That leaves the perfect place for continued editing. When I compare your edit to the original post it looks much more fluid. Overall great job, I can't wait to read more from you!

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Standard (No problems as far as I can see.)

Language
Exceeds Standard (Well-written and encyclopedic in tone.)

Organization
Exceeds Standard (Organization is great and the flow is perfect.)

Coding
Meets Standard (Reference/Footnote 2 has a code error, otherwise, great.)

Validity
Exceeds Standard (Everything seems legitimate.)

Completion
Exceeds Standard (Obviously not complete, but ideas are developed and information is elaborated on. Everything stated is explained in-depth.)

Relevance
Exceeds Standard (Everything seems to be quite relevant. The only thing that is possibly irrelevant/speculative is the portion on Dante; maybe you could find another source to corroborate?).