User talk:Guyb123321

Regarding your email
It appears that you edit from an IP address which is part of a range of IP addresses which had to be blocked. I must emphasize that this has nothing to do with you. Unfortunately, someone who is particularly persistant about disrupting and vandalizing Wikipedia edits from the same group of IP addresses as you do. However, I have granted you a special user right called IP Block Exemption, which will allow you to edit freely through this block. You should have no further problems. For more information on the IP Block Exemption user right, click the blue link I provided. -- Jayron  32  15:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradford Council election, 2011


A tag has been placed on Bradford Council election, 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind talk  17:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El Mirador del Mediterrano


The article El Mirador del Mediterrano has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No assertion of notability, no sources added, no significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Polling
Please do not delete polls simply because you don't like them, as you did on Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Thank you. Tiller54 (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion re Minneapolis_mayoral_election,_2013
A suggestion if I may: One of us needs to split the results table at Minneapolis_mayoral_election,_2013. I suggest rounds 1 to 13, then 14 to 27-ish or so, and so on, so that the table(s) will fit on a landscape-oriented piece of 8.5x11 inch paper. I've already posted a similar suggestion to User:LightSoup. LP-mn (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582745708 your edit] to London Stansted Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ], Seville, Shannon, Skellefteå begins April 2014, Stockholm-Skavsta, Strasbourg, [["Solidarity"
 * Stansted Airport subsequently defined in the Air Transport White Paper in December 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/whitepapers/air/ [

Speedy deletion nomination of Bsvgfsgrw


A tag has been placed on Bsvgfsgrw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wieno (talk) 09:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

European Parliament election, 2013 (France) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect European Parliament election, 2013 (France). Since you had some involvement with the European Parliament election, 2013 (France) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wieno (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in New York, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

UK Local Elections
Hi mate, before anything else is changed, the swing vote is not and actual swing percent. It is based off of an estimation by the BBC. Therefore it cannot possibly be a swing. For example the Conservatives did horrendously bad but they have a "swing" of plus four. I think a new section should be made with your findings, under say "Polling" or "Predicted Share" just not in the factual part of the page. Looking forward to your response. HughTubex (talk) 09:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

We already use the BBC's "National Projected Vote" (NPV) for swings across all local elections, with the swing being every year as opposed to every four years. You can go right back to the 2005 local elections to see that every page has a swing comparing it with the previous year so that for example 2010 is compared with 2009, not 2006, 2011 is compared with 2010 not with 2007, 2012 is compared with 2011, not with 2008 and 2013 is compared with 2012, not with 2008. In my view, since the BBC extrapolates the results to take into account that some counties aren't voting in these local, while some areas such as London are obviously all voting, the NPV compared to last year is the correct, accurate way that swing should be shown. The NPV that the BBC calculates, is not done by simply adding up all the votes for UKIP, Con, LibDem and Lab and then working out a percentage, its so much more complicated than that, meaning that even if you did want to change the way wikipedia shows the swing to the elections happening four years ago then you would have to change the percentages because if you looked at the actual votes, I'm sure Labour won very much more than 31%, as most of the areas voting this year, London and the Metropolitan Boroughs, are heavily Labour, the vote percentage that we have reported, is if these elections had happened across the country.

The reason, that for example UKIP can be seen as doing very well (winning council seats) but also down on the vote share is simple, compared to 2013, UKIP did slightly worse, in that it get a slightly smaller share of the vote, however compared to 2010, it did a million times better as it got virtually nothing when these seats were last up. The Conservatives, they've recovered ever so slightly from 2013 when both the main parties got historic lows of under 30% each, but that four point recovery still puts them down on 2010 causing them to lose council seats. The Liberal Democrats, haven't really done that much worse now than last year, hence there vote share is down only by one point, however as these seats were last up in 2010, they lost a lot of councillors. Hope that explains it :) Guyb123321 (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Undone Edit
No, you're wrong. You edited at 10:37BST when the votes were still being counted in Western Isles as BBC News webpage made clear. What they were showing was no more than a projection. That's why it was premature. At the time I undid your edit (11:25 BST) it was still not complete. Emeraude (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Adur District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Independent


 * Basildon Borough Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Independent


 * Wyre Forest District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Independent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Secondcity


A tag has been placed on Secondcity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin12xd (contribs) 14:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve SecondCity
Hi, I'm Mabalu. Guyb123321, thanks for creating SecondCity!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add further information on SecondCity to show what makes him significant and special - especially biographical information supported by citations. Who is he? Where is he from? What is his real name? Where is he based? Etc. etc.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mabalu (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

next UK General Election description of polling shifts
Hi, I notice you on the next United Kingdom general election talk page. Bondegezou and I have been discussing the possibility of a prose summary of the major shifts and trends in public opinion over the Parliament (where that can be seen reported in reliable sources) on the article page. I have started to draft, but would like others' views before I put too much work into it. Please comment! DrArsenal (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Berlin State Election Articles
Hi, are you planning to add content to your Berlin State Election articles soon? They might be deleted by others if you don't. Westroopnerd (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Well yes obviously, I'm just copying the data from the German Wiki Guyb123321 (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve West Berlin state election, 1981
Hi, I'm Nrwairport. Guyb123321, thanks for creating West Berlin state election, 1981!

I've just tagged the page, as having some issues to fix. The issue is that you cannot use other Wikipedia articles as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nrwairport (talk) 00:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve West Berlin state election, 1979
Hi, I'm Nrwairport. Guyb123321, thanks for creating West Berlin state election, 1979!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You cannot use other Wikipedia pages as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nrwairport (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve West Berlin state election, 1975
Hi, I'm Nrwairport. Guyb123321, thanks for creating West Berlin state election, 1975!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You cannot use Wikipedia pages as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nrwairport (talk) 00:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve West Berlin state election, 1971
Hi, I'm Nrwairport. Guyb123321, thanks for creating West Berlin state election, 1971!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You cannot use Wikipedia pages as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nrwairport (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve West Berlin state election, 1967
Hi, I'm Nrwairport. Guyb123321, thanks for creating West Berlin state election, 1967!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You cannot use Wikipedia pages as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nrwairport (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Thanks for contributing the new article. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using an inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Nrwairport (talk) 00:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tove Lo&#39;s UK tour dates for her Queen of the Clouds Tour.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tove Lo&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 14:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Got it, added the sources now! :)Guyb123321 (talk) 14:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, their social media pages still fail. Per the Twitter policy, they cannot be used if they involve third-parties. Plus, I'm adding a reference that is third-party and preferred over Twitter. Also, make sure you fully cite your sources. Plus, the tour page actually fails to meet the notability guidelines for concert tours, so it really should be redirected until its launch.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 14:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Did you actually look at the referencing rather than just undoing the edit? Look at the LANY tweet - It's from their account Guyb123321 (talk) 14:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, literally your only contribution to the article has been undoing edits - great help Guyb123321 (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Whether it's from their account or not do noes matter, per the Twitter policy, tweets cannot be included if they include claims of third-parties. Saying they're opening for a tour of another artist, is making claims of a third-party.  It defies the original research and citing policies.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 14:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

So your saying it cant be included even when both the original artist and the other artist have both confirmed through their twitters? At the end of the day its gonna happen and the page will get updated, you're just delaying the inevitable Guyb123321 (talk) 14:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That is exactly what I'm saying. The policy is strictly written to avoid controversial claims of BLPs, etc. All that needs to be done is a third-party, reliable source needs to be fully cited. I've found one, as well as provided necessary updates to the article, even though the article itself fails to meet the notability for concert tours.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 14:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Katy B - Honey.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Katy B - Honey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at AlunaGeorge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  snαp • snαp  (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Benton County, Mississippi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

House vacancies
Did a House vacancy happen today? The only ones I know of are Meadows, Hunter, and Collins. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, Ratcliffe - TX-04 Guyb123321 (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, of course. Thanks!JTRH (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello, Guyb123321! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Ages
You cannot guess people’s ages from a report on a specific date. I am 41 now, but could have been born in 1979 or 1980 depending on when my birthday is. Please do not guess when adding to WP:BLP articles. They also require strong sourcing from multiple sources to pass WP:BLPPRIVACY.

A final note, you should be adding references in line, not as an edit summary.

Cheers GimliDotNet (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, apolgies - will go back and add the two years that all these people could be! Please could you confirm what is required regarding "strong sourcing" Guyb123321 (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The policy is published at WP:BLPPRIVACY, but it can be summarised as you need multiple reliable sources for the information to be included, without them we must not add the information and err on the side of privacy. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Understood - thank you - just to confirm: a minimum of two published sources and if you just have an age you should put both years (i.e (born 1980/81)) for accuracy? - thanks Guyb123321 (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I wouldn’t include anything unless there was a source that confirmed the birth date or year. For example if the article said he was born in 1979 then that would suffice, but if you wanted to say 01 March 1979 then that should have multiple sources. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * If you have multiple sources stating someone's age on a given date, from that you can work out someone was born in one of two years and this is permitted no?


 * I am not aware of any specific rule, some editors might object in the grounds of WP:SYNTH but that would be up to them. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Lesia Vasylenko moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lesia Vasylenko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Mattdaviesfsic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 455, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)