User talk:Guychicago

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/209.218.255.138 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Gay Chicago with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Calabe1992 (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Calabe1992 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Gay Chicago. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Gay Chicago, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  04:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Note
Your account will be blocked very soon if you continue editing in the same style. Please stop for a while and read this message.
 * Do avoid personal attacks (e.g. those in your edit summaries). Violating WP:Civility may result in a block of otherwise constructive editor.
 * Do provide reliable, secondary references with your edits. References to Guy Chicago website in an article on Guy Chicago are not considered reliable.
 * Avoid edit warring by all means and talk to the editor who reverts you instead of reverting back. Materialscientist (talk) 04:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello Guychicago. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gay Chicago, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2011 (UTC)