User talk:Guyfawkes101

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezwan Khan
Hello Guyfawkes101,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rezwan Khan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Neutrality and COI
Hi Guyfawkes101, the articles you've recently created and edited raise concerns re: WP:COI and WP:NPOV guidelines--there does appear to be a promotional intent. I may raise this at a relevant noticeboard, and encourage you to read the above linked policies, as well as WP:RELIABLE. Wikipedia does not usually accept court documents or blogs as reliable source, and advocacy websites are often problematic to use as sources. Thank you, JNW (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, while all of the pages I have begun to create are noteworthy, I will continue to edit them to address your concerns. As to the People v. Jovan Jackson, it is the landmark decision in the area of medical marijuana law in California. Looking at other pages that reference court cases the actual opinion is frequently cited, a published appellate court opinion is generally regarded as a reliable source of information, so I am unsure as to why you say that. There has been extensive amount written in regards to that case, and I will continue to edit People v. Jovan Jackson to reflect those sources.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. JNW (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)