User talk:Gvkvmg/test21

Comments
Nice draft, Gvkvmg. Now work to edit this for more precise language. You want to say the most you can as clearly as possible with the fewest words. Also, be sure that you are saying exactly what you mean. For example, are you sure you mean "tractable?" Also, watch passive phrasing such as: "blockchain technology is explored." You will want to read this back in relationship to the rest of the article to make sure it flows, as much as that is possible. Finally, be sure to edit for typos and such. --Jbdolphin (talk) 06:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I think you have a really good start to a draft or contribution. You have made a lot of good notes to the sandbox and created a good starting point to work off of.ApprehensiveAlpaca (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This draft looks good. It's a small edit but it adds good information and clarification to the article. --Dqdolphin (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This is a strong edit. I appreciate how concise it is, and there are no unnecessary details. It may be wise to ensure everything is properly punctuated and in the correct tense. This will allow your additions to seamlessly integrate into the article and prevent any potential confusion for readers. Also, if you are going to say that "Several companies" are attempting to use blockchain technology, there should be several examples. Try to avoid using generalizations without providing adequate examples. This is a simple fix, as you could provide more examples or simply edit your word choice. Overall strong edits, these will be useful additions to the article and give readers a better understanding of the subject they're researching. --Echoloc8n (talk) 03:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)