User talk:Gvuyhg

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Big coon sake"
A page you created, Big coon sake, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Re creation of nonsense page 'Fgujhi9f0duj'. vzaak 00:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jake and the Never Land Pirates. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  01:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Big coon sake


A tag has been placed on Big coon sake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 331dot (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fgujhi9f0duj


A tag has been placed on Fgujhi9f0duj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mat ty. 007 11:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mat ty. 007 11:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jbyhdu
Hello Gvuyhg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jbyhdu for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jayakumar RG (talk) 11:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)