User talk:Gwapong Chikoy

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 07:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Gwapong Chikoy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, Gwapong Chikoy. You are not doing yourself any favours by continuing to edit while blocked. Just because you are not using your account does not mean your activity is not evident. I suggest you step away from the English Wikipedia project until well after resurrection Sunday. At that point, you might be eligible for a Wikipedia:Standard offer. Please read that several times over the next six months and be prepared not to edit Wikipedia until you open a discussion about the standard offer. I am convinced that if you continue to try to circumvent the block, you will have out-stayed your welcome and no admin will even entertain an unblock request—even one that is reasonably worded.
 * And for the record, block notices and unblock requests must stay in-place on your talk page while you are blocked. Continuing to remove them will result in loss of editing privileges to your own talk page, which will make asking to be unblocked much more difficult. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)