User talk:Gwelliano

July 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Escape the Night. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Isaidnoway (talk) 22:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Escape the Night shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Brojam (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Escape the Night‎ for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

I honestly believe this one as not being a sockpuppet. There may be WP:MEAT concerns since it's odd that it showed up right after the other user got blocked from the article, but looking at the histories, I'd believe them to be separate users. Also, TonyBallioni ran a checkuser that I think would have caught it had there been a connection between these two accounts. Would you be willing to consider an unblock if I implement an indefinite partial block from the Escape the Night page to mitigate any future MEAT concerns at that article? only (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe this to be WP:MEAT, which firmly counts as sockpuppetry. I have no objections to unblocking with an indefinite partial block. --Yamla (talk) 18:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Gwelliano, I have restored your talk page access; do you accept the restriction proposed by Only? Salvio 17:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * To make sure it's clear: if you accept, I'll partially block your account, which means that I will turn off your ability to edit the Escape the Night article, but you will be able to edit every other part of Wikipedia. only (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I also think this is a MEAT case, happy to unblock with restrictions on page in question. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)