User talk:GwenShamblinRepresentative

Please do not remove information from Wikipedia, as you did in the Gwen Shamblin article. You are welcome to edit the article, so long as you keep to WP:NPOV. You may also want to see WP:BLP  and WP:AUTO. Novalis 15:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

O.K. Sorry about that and thanks for the warning. Any tips on what should be done when information is totally incorrect? There are some significant problems with certain areas of this.
 * See also our policy on Conflict of interests. I have responded to your request at WP:BLP/N ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Follow up on jossi's note
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Yechiel Man 10:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gwen Shamblin And Children.jpg
Who holds the copyright on this image?Genisock2 18:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Gwen Shamblin And Children.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gwen Shamblin And Children.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)