User talk:GwenWolf

Welcome
Hi GwenWolf, I'm Viewmont Viking. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Reliable sources. VViking Talk Edits 13:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC) -- VViking Talk Edits 13:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your guidance. I cited studies published on the NIH website as I recall. I gave all the required details for the sourcing. I found the article as it was written was incredibly skewed and hoped to bring a little balance showing that there are reputable studies showing more diverse and quite positive results.  I find the same issue with the article on Traditional Chinese Medicine, which may in fact be the same article I added a few minor additions to trying to make it less biased through showing factual, reliable sources, studies.  I will take a look at the Medicine talk page as you suggest.  It is disturbing to me that Wikipedia in this regard has an article that is so biased, so I am interested in seeing what the strict channels that have been established are to bring a broader and more representative perspective of what is being born out in reputable studies.   GwenWolf (talk) 03:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it or an alternate version.-- VViking Talk Edits 14:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Girth Summit  (blether) 14:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)