User talk:Gwernol/Archive 21

Request for block
Can you please block 66.228.70.170. If you check his user page, he is continuing to vandalize. I reverted one of his pieces of vandalism, but it is obvious if you look at his/her "contribs" they are up to no good. user:reds0xfan 2 mar 2007

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 16:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC).

Thanks
Thanks for the super fast action. As always you are a star. Alun 06:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, Eoganan is back as User:69.157.100.203 and possibly User:65.92.92.95 who may be a meatpuppet. Alun 08:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Also User:69.157.108.162 contribs who is also User:Pan-ethnic contribs. The IP edits Pan-ethnic's user page, it's the same IP as Eoganan, and Pan-ethnic reverts Eoganan's edits. I have been freely reverting these edits. I am assuming that reverting the edits of a user evading a block cannot break the three revert rule (I have heard this before), am I correct in that assumption? Alun 13:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi
I am NOT Eoganan and I am pissed off that I cant even edit on here. I have already filed a complaint to other admins with the block on my IP. Just because I have facts and knowledge that is the TRUTH and stops the destructive and extremist views of other users like Wobble is not reason for me to banned. Neither is the fact that I know Eoganan (James) and you mistaking him for me just because I know him. I am not Eoganan and if you dont like it, you can go fuck yourself. You know I'm right. Not eoganan 08:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Narrow gauge railways in Saxony
Hi Gwernol, you have changed article name "List of narrow gauges in Saxony" (linked to de:Liste der Schmalspurbahnen in Sachsen) to "Narrow gauge railways in Saxony" (currently re-linked by anonymous user to de:Sächsische Schmalspurbahnen). I suggest to keep the current stub as a list, I suggest to change its name to "List of narrow gauge railways in Saxony" and link it to de:Liste der Schmalspurbahnen in Sachsen. I consider the list helpful, it is easier to understand for users with elementary level of English and also easier to translate to other languages (I would like to make a Czech version some day). Regards JanSuchy 09:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Spamstar of Glory
Many thanks for your tireless efforts in keeping article clear of spam and other nonsense. Wikipedia is a better quality project because of hardworking and conscientious editors like you!--Hu12 17:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

NPOV Message
I noticed the NPOV policy messages you put on User_talk:Stevo6969. I would like to use the messages myself for times when I notice similar unhelpful contributions. The question is, what do you type into a user's talk page so that this message will appear? M rug 2  01:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry about the Bob Saget edit. Someone else was using my computer and was not aware of the finer points of Wikipedia. 128.211.177.36 02:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring
Do I appear to be in an edit war on the article of Iran? I don't believe I have broken the 3RR on it. I hope you gave the same warning to Pejman too? Usergreatpower 17:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC) I just checked and no you haven't given him the same warning. Why? Usergreatpower 17:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Bus routes
How do I create proper Infoboxes and can you help me with my bus routes and not delete them.CourtneyBonnick 22:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

LFC editing summary
Yeah, I can't help it sometimes when things piss me off, and this is an example of it, an example that always seems to happen. People keep messing with that opening all the time, adding and taking things off, and it takes the piss so much! OMFG! People need to make the ultimate one, then leave it alone. The latest pathetic retarded change of many is that someone's took off about Liverpool F.C. and the rest of the English clubs were banned from UEFA Club Competition, with LFC's being a bit more than the rest though. Goodbye! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mazito (talk • contribs).

Vermont revert
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I thought that 159.105.61.207's edit was spam too, but I checked both links and the one they changed from www.travel-vermont.com to www.vermontvacation.com are both the same. I just thought you would want to know... :) -- Whereizben - Chat with me 18:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The View
I did receive your comment about The View. I don't agree with your statement. I can cite that if you need to. Also, you can watch the video on youtube at This information is not a matter of opinion, but it is factual and I believe that we should quote her in The View. 1312020wikicop 18:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I will go ahead and do that but without the last phrase, something to the extent of "Rosie O'Donnell has stated that 'radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.'"

Thanks, 1312020wikicop 18:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

How am I ruining the George Bush's talk page?
Seriously, all I did was tell them what is going on, if you are pro-bush and do not want to face the cold hard facts then that's your problem buddy, now if you excuse me I'll put back what I said, now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.117.224.10 (talk) 02:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC).

an AfD repost...or a memory glitch re: Tanya Foxx article

 * Bad memory glitch for me??? The article creator has a history of NN articles which were either AfD'd or Speedy D'd. I was sure this one went through the "long road". Was it a speedy? If neither then I guess I need another cup of coffee to perk my memory up. The article is definitely a {prod} if anything. Like the creators other articles it shades WP:BIO and WP:NN pretty thinly. 156.34.142.110 15:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

While on the topic of reposts...this article, Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time has been around before and, I believe, deleted after an AfDdue to the "copyvio-ness" of reprinting a published list. I say it's a repost....but with my earlier mem lapse....I thought I'd better check with you to see if I was right. Pondering deeply I almost think this article has been re-posted/deleted before. But, I could be wrong. Thanks for your time. 156.34.142.110 18:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I think the copyvio part comes into play as it's just a copy/paste of Rolling Stone's already published list. The previous version of the article actually veered away from the actual list and turned into a POV push for all the "notables" who didn't make the list....And the edit war that went along with it. I have no problem with the article, I just wanted to make sure rules were being adhered to. Thanks for looking into it. Have a nice day! 156.34.142.110 19:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Euromasters
Hi, I agree that the album listing indicates notability. It wasn't there when I tagged the article. It's amazing what sort of information comes to light when an article is tagged! Cheers. --Butseriouslyfolks 18:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Seema Luthra
In this edit summary, you state: (The article does make an assertion of notability. Please take this to AfD).

The article read, and still reads, in its entirety:

"Seema Luthra is an Indian Congress party candidate for Delhi."

According to WP:BIO, notability of politicians is established as follows:


 * Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures.


 * Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.


 * Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability.

So how and where does the article assert notability?

--Butseriouslyfolks 20:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Respectfully, I think you may have misread the article. It does not claim that this person is a candidate for the Indian Congress Party. It claims that this person is a candidate from the Indian Congress Party. The cited news article states that she lost the election. ("Trounced" is the word used in the cited article.) I strongly believe that we are required to refer to WP:N in making speedy determinations. Note that WP:N is incorporated into the language of the deletion template itself:


 * "it is an article about a that does not  assert the |importance or significance of the subject."  (Note the linked page.)

Otherwise, what are we using as a guide other than our subjective interpretation of the contributor's subjective assessment of whether the subject is notable? Why is the fact that Johnny is "brave" any less notable than the fact that this person is a candidate? All it takes to become a candidate is signatures from 10-20 people. Bravery is something you have to be born with. --Butseriouslyfolks 21:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Colleges
Hi there; I am, of course, aware of the standard warning re anonymous vandalism, six-month blocks and communication with Principals as related to vandalism from multiple ISP sites identified as schools and colleges. Do we actually ever do this? Because you must by now have been vandalised by everey student in North America! And yes, I do recall your saying that it flushes the vandals out of the woodwork. But it must be annoying for you.--Anthony.bradbury 20:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Block
Re. User:Chimpanda. You might want to check the logs as I don't think the indefblock happened - Alison ☺ 00:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just as a follow up to this, I've just realised by looking at Chimpanda's indef tag on my talk page, the users a sock of User:Lolhat who I indef blocked earlier today. Cheers for the block Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 01:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

"Zionist disinformation agent"
Does that pay well? Because I reverted the ridiculous claims on the Borat page the earlier this week, so I sure wanna get in on this action :) WookMuff 01:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, the pay is wonderful. I actually am Sacha Baron Cohen. I'm an anti-semitic, pro-Zionist, Jewish, anti-Zionist, pro-Nazi, German, Arab, Pro-Semitic Double agent of the Iranian-US-Israeli world conspiracy against everyone. We rule the world, cause all the naughty things that happen all in the cause of taking over the world. I'm also a Gnome of Zurich. :-) Gwernol 01:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Forget Zionist disinformation agent, I now wanna be a gnome of zurich... thats where the REAL money is! WookMuff 01:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, you can't be a gnome of Zurich, we are a very exclusive group of secret rulers of the world. Most of the rabbles that secretly rule the world let anyone join, but we're very picky. Now, please excuse me, I have to get back to counting all my money and conspiring the take over the world /pinky and the brain. Gwernol 01:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Man, I thought all you had to do was give the gnome some of your treasure... lied to again "ZORK II!!!" (ala "KHAAAAAAAAAN") WookMuff 01:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

unblocking problem
Thanks man, I'm unblocked now! I don't know what was wrong, but thanks for your assistance! --GoIrish24 02:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry man, I was just experimenting... Cheers dude! --Domo Arigato, Mrs. Robato 03:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Advice, please
Gwernol, when I go for RfA it is, I suspect, virtually certain that Someone will pick up on the obvious fact that I have virtually no involvement in image manipulation; largely because for the articles which I have submitted, very few or no images are available. Questions; do you think this will be a problem, and should I make a pre-emptive declaration about it in my optional statement? I am also low in template work, but I see that as a specialist field which I have not attempted to enter.--Anthony.bradbury 11:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you. As you know, apart from article-writing, which I continue to do, my main areas of expertise and interest are vandal-fighting in all its aspects, and in newby-helping. (Also spend time in AfD and RfA). I will take your advice and make an appropriate declarative statement along these lines when/if I am nominated for RfA.--Anthony.bradbury 12:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

67.83.153.55
Hi Gwernol,

You blocked this user a month ago for persistent spamming on the Google Pack article. The user is back and has continued in the same fashion with all edits being to spam the same article. Could a longer block be instituted? Thanks. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Reverting my talk page?
Hi Gwernol. I'm puzzled by your reversion of something Middle Eastern left on my talk page. Can you explain? There's some whacked-out stuff there, including fan mail from Kiyosaki the crank – but I like to think it's a free-speech zone in the broadest sense.

I reverted your revert, with I must admit a rather snappish edit summary. It's now occurred to me that perhaps Middle Eastern was in violation of policy, maybe for 'campaigning' on talk pages or something. If this is the case, go ahead and revert it back, but can you please also leave a note explaining the relevant policy? And please also accept my apologies for my snippy edit summary. Cheers. --G-Dett 15:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

What are the two steps I've missed?
And why couldn't you have just fixed it for me, instead of deleting it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hoponpop69 (talk • contribs).

User:Middle Eastern
It's not an anonymizing service, it's simply his IP, the one he used before, and the one he used for a number of other socks. He wrote the unblock list in February, pretending to be someone else, and claiming that the IP was "shared by 10 houses". Now he's claiming it's an anonymizer. Neither story was true. Jayjg (talk) 11:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

hoponpop69
you recently warned hoponpop69 for his conduct in the dicussion part of the blink 182 article, could i please also refer you to that same articles history, where he uses insults in the edit summary. Olir 17:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

wondering if..
you could take a look at developments on User:MiddleEastern's page. there was a sense that perhaps the whole thing was a big misunderstanding and as you were the first admin to check it out, I thought it would be good for you to swing by if you have a chance. Tiamut 17:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:UW future?
Hi Gwernol,

Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace template issue. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khu kri 10:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Gwernol, I am slightly embarrassed to ask this. You will, I know, recall that you were kind enough to undertake a semi-formal edit review for me, whih as I understand it you found essentially satisfactory. You were also kind enough to say that on my return from holiday, which happened on March 4th, you would consider nominating me for RfA. I know that you have yourself been on wikibreak, because I am one of the editors living on your userpage reverting mindless edits. I really dislike the concept of self-nomination, although I know it is widespread. I also quite dislike canvassing for nomination, and do so only becausae of your previous spontaneous offer. If you now find reason to withdraw this offer I will absolutely understand.--Anthony.bradbury 23:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Gwernol, I've decided to nominate Anthony (sorry!), I've emailed you about it anyway Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 23:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your block on 204.185.75.130
Why is the User_talk:204.185.75.130 user talk page semi-protected? I feel that it is unnecessary to protect that user page. Thanks in advance! --Spixels 18:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Protect conflict
Woops D: We both protected that troll's userpage at the same time, but I did indef. Should we even reinstate the expiry?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 23:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Gwernol, however it goes, I would like now to express my deep and heartfelt thanks, without waiting for the result, for your truly supportive comment. Thank you.--Anthony.bradbury 00:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Last yime I made a really stupid answer to a supplementary question, late at night, and there was no way home. This time I hope to convince the community that I have a positive value.--Anthony.bradbury 00:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Range block of the FSU vandal
Hi Gwernol. I'm seriously considering a range block on the FSU vandal, based on all known IP addresses and limiting the subnet mask as tight as possible to prevent collateral damage. It was Anthony above who precipitated that :) Too many editors are wasting their time reverting them and a month-long range block would stop them. Needless to say, I'll bring this up on WP:ANI first, but I'd love your input, seeing as you're bearing the worst of this (today again!). I'm a newbie admin now so be gentle! - Alison ☺ 00:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Gwernol, interested to see your changes one Harry Potter-will probably notify my friends. I didn't realise how much trouble vandalism caused, I'm very sorry. I'm only leaving a message, beacuse I'm a member of the Corris railway too.

Request to delete redundant article
In an attempt to increase the information about railway suppliers, I recently created the Union Switch and Signal article. Somehow, the already-existing Union Switch & Signal article didn't show up in my Wikipedia search. By chance, I later found the older article. Since I was the only contributor to the new article, I moved all of its text to the original article. I then deleted all that text in my article and left a note explaining what I had done. I would appreciate it if you could delete the redundant article. Thanks. Truthanado 15:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made Union Switch and Signal redirect to Union Switch & Signal. There were actually a couple of articles that linked to Union Switch and Signal, but I've now altered them so that they link directly to Union Switch & Signal. Signalhead 15:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Many Thanks Truthanado 16:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Impersonator
I'll let you figured out what you'd like to do about it, but I wanted to let you know that ColdDiablo is currently transcribing your userpage. Not sure if (s)he thinks (s)he's an admin, but (s)he also left a block notice (not in your name) at User talk:Warofdreams. ShadowHalo 02:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

What?
What are you talking about? I Didn't vandalize the Wesley Clark page! I got rid of the vandalism on that page!! The vandalism included things like "he was getting raped by Vietnamese soldiers", which I got rid of! The right person who did this is still probably still at large. I have found the IP and it is 24.211.162.129 68.102.104.55 02:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning
I am sorry, but I think you misunderstood the situation at Turkey: it is not an edit-war, it is vandalism. I have already filed a report at requests for page protection. There is a user who is single-handedly vandalizing both Turkey and Armenia (the latter was protected by User:Khoikhoi for the same reason) and User:El C protected Turkey two days ago for the same reason, and me and a bunch of editors have been busy reverting this user who keeps resurrecting himself repeatedly.. There is no content dispute in reality.. Baristarim 01:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

PS (I accidentally pasted this to your user page instead of your talk page, sorry about that!) Baristarim 01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.". That user has indicated in his summaries that he is making his edits per WP:POINT. That article is a Featured Article and a user who has used up 50+ or so accounts to get his point through in many articles by placing an irrelevant paragraph on top of the page, before anything else, is compromising the integrity of Wikipedia and that of one of its best articles. I am not going, nor should any Wikipedian, sit on his hands and let that happen. All I am saying is that it is vandalism if the edits are done per POINT by a user who has resurrected himself fifty times already without a legitimate content dispute taking place. Please see the article history to see what I mean (and that of Armenia). Baristarim 02:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Cowlyd & Eigiau
Hi Gwernol, Sorry, but your editing of Cowlyd & Eigiau Tramways is not correct. You have removed a chunk of the "Eigiau Tramway" and erroneously called it the "Cowlyd Tramway". This needs to be reverted - it was correct as it was. For detail on the Cowlyd Tramway, there is quite a bit on this under Llyn Cowlyd. By the way, the tramways are such an integral part of the story of the lakes/dams that I think they also deserve some mention in the main article, not just a "see also". I'm well busy right now, so will let you carry on. Hogyn Lleol 11:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Gwernol, I have now removed the tramway content of "Llyn Cowlyd" to "Cowlyd Tramway", a separate article, and have moved what _was_ under "Cowlyd Tramway" to "Eigiau Tramway", making it correct. Your content of "Eigiau Tramway" I have now put under "Cedryn Tramway" as I think the two need to be differentiated. All three might still need a bit of tidying - I'll have another look tomorrow - but at least it's all in the right place now. It would be great if you have any more detail on any of them ..... Regards, Hogyn Lleol 19:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images
You've deleted an image on my Talkpage with the summary "Fair use images may not be placed on user talk pages." I'm sure you're right— why not?— but how did you ever come to find such a rule out? You can see that I'd be no good as an Administrator: I just don't have that kind of leisure, to be pursuing infractions. I have quite enough to do just cleaning off anonymous scribbles. --Wetman 12:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Gwernol, its ur mate droop. Sorry about the Vandilism, I didn't realise these were made public and it manly my brother mucking on my account. Sorry, I will never do it again. Don't block my account.

Dinofang
I've requested this user be blocked for putting fake barnstars on people's pages, and for general vandalism. After the work you put in reverting the guy's vandalism, i figured you'd be best placed to add something on WP:AIV to make sure another vandal bites the dust, as it were. Cheers, Jonomacdrones  (talk)  22:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Yo dude!
Sup man! Hows it goin these days, blocking people. You make this page horrible. Block me go ahead, Ill start vandalzing on my computer, my laptop, my other computer, my cell phone, my other laptop, etc. HA! Take that =] =]...jake says hi. And advises you to fall off a bridge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikieditor is back (talk • contribs) 12:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

Sorry!
Dear Gwernol,

I am very sorry. Is this not the Wilkipedia? Please respond to me soon.

Sincerely,

Akmak03 15:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Gwernol, I did not intend to add nonsense to your usertalking page. Upon further review, I have realized that you are correct--this is the "Wikipedia", not the "Wilkipedia". I apologize for this error; however, it was a rather easy one to make. What's more, I was only trying to improve the Wikipedia page by doing what I thought was correction of typographical errors. Thank you for correcting me, though--I feel somewhat sheepishly embarrassed now that I know this is not the "Wilkipedia."

Please be patient with me, as I am still learning the rules here. I am a newcomer--please don't bite me. :-D

Akmak03 18:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

User and talk page
Thanks for the reverts. Their original comments were way funnier. 20:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Protection
Gwernol, I've semi protected your userpage for 48 hours as it's been getting serious vandalism and I know your busy at the minute. By all means revert the protection, this is just an immediate measure. Sorry if you feel it's inappropriate. Cheers Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 23:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Mewtwowimmer's RFA
What will happen to Requests for adminship/Mewtwowimmer 2? Will it just stay there? I was actually going to oppose him becoming an administrator. Squirepants101 00:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Requests for adminship/Tails0600
This RfA was withdrawn two days ago. I've removed your oppose opinion since once an RfA has been withdrawn it should not be added to. Thanks, Gwernol 01:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A bcrat must have forgot to close the nomination as fail. — zero » 01:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. It's much appreciated. SteveO 11:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks too :-) Myanw 12:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Add me to that list!  RΞDVΞRS ✖  ЯΞVΞЯSΞ  15:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Paul Barlow...etc
A number of users have suddenly appeared reverting my edits mechanically user:Henry XXV and user:Kebek Libre I assume that these are socks of the recently blocked User:Stalvione on some sort of revenge mission. User:Paul Barlow : closet homosexual has now appeared. Is there anything that can be done about this? Paul B 17:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandal
I have asked another admin to block this guy, as his sole purpose is messing with things. Wahkeenah 17:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

My Chemical Romance
I have a reference but it would look untidy putting a link beside it. How do I spruce it up?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KinkyCheese (talk • contribs).

John Lennon - Edit
I don't see why you changed the way I edited the John Lennon page.

I changed Murder to - Assassination.

Wikipedia's definition of Assassination is: "Assassination is the murder of a political figure or another important individual"

I feel this is a valid change and see no reason why i am in violation.

Richyhello


 * I recall some people at the time calling it "assassination". That's borderline, it might be a bit of hyberbole. That term usually refers to killing a politician or activist. Lennon was an activist, and if the CIA had done it, instead of a lunatic fan, the case for "assassination" would be stronger. Wahkeenah 01:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Vincent van Gogh
Great work on quick reverts. It's worth watch listing as it's always getting vandalism. I know you're not short of barnstars, but you deserve another. Tyrenius 01:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Bob freeman1
I don't know if this edit should be called vandalism. The user seemed to have modified their behavior somewhat after the first three messages, so I think some limited good faith should be assumed. —Doug Bell 03:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Uhm...
Meteoroidtest IS Z.E.R.O., fyi. Z.E.R.O. was formerly known as User:Meteoroid. – Chacor 03:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Your revert
Please explain why you have revert my test account's edit? That account was made in order to prevent collateral damage to my edit count. — zero » 03:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for sitting on my userspace with a bazooka! ,, probably more that I've deleted/can't find right now... :) – Riana talk 09:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Gwernol, thank you most sincerely for your support in my successful RfA, and for all of your help and advice in the preparation leading up to it. When you are back from Real Life, I hope that I can occasionally at need seek advice from you?--Anthony.bradbury 10:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments on my RfB
Perhaps you have noticed, perhaps you haven't, but I responded to your comments on my RfB. Kind regards.  Majorly  (o rly?) 15:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey there, is there any reason why you're not responding? Two others have also responded to your comment, I'd really appreciate it if you'd take a look. Thanks.  Majorly  (o rly?) 17:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I responded to the points you brought up. I would really appreciate it if you'd consider your position.  Majorly  (o rly?) 19:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please don't just ignore me; if you don't wish to respond please just say so.  Majorly  (o rly?) 20:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You forget RfA is a discussion. We are meant to discuss it. I am not badgering you, I'm pointing out I have responded to your comments. I don't appreciate you ignoring me. It's necessary because I have explained my reasoning for the things you pointed out. You pulled a lot of things out of context, and I've had to correct you. Thus, you original reasoning is wrong, and now other people are opposing "per" this incorrect reasoning. Also, which supporters have made gross misrepresentations?  Majorly  (o rly?) 21:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Just trying not to have pornographic images on Wikipedia
I received a couple of notices about my vandalism. I think showing nude pictures of women in bondage doesn't belong here. It's starting to look like a porn site. However, I'll stop since the pictures I deleted are restored. 20:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)~

Your knocking of external links to the Coffeetime Wiki, I didn't think it was an innapropriate link considering the site is dedicated to coffee? If it is inappropriate, I will of course stop wasting my time trying to post it.

I also had a link for the Coffetime Greens club knocked from home roasting...this is a non profit green coffee buying co-operative, run by a group of home roasters...why an earth would this be knocked off?? Surely it's of benefit to those in the UK considering home roasting and looking for a non-commercial source of coffee.

I'm a bit confused.

Daveccoffeetime

Another harasser (sorry to bother you)
This time using the name User:Tijsia, and again on the Talk page of User:Cleo123. You will notice that I am the one who has notified another Admin, User:AuburnPilot, of the User:Xindiweapon harassment. It just seems to go on and on. Bus stop 23:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)