User talk:Gwladys57

Welcome!
Hello, Gwladys57, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BLACK BELT WATCH, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! InsertCleverPhraseHere  12:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of BLACK BELT WATCH


A tag has been placed on BLACK BELT WATCH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. InsertCleverPhraseHere  12:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BLACK BELT WATCH


A tag has been placed on BLACK BELT WATCH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. InsertCleverPhraseHere  12:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BLACK BELT WATCH


A tag has been placed on BLACK BELT WATCH, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RA 0808 talkcontribs 14:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Your challenge to speedy deletion of BLACK BELT WATCH
Hi Gwladys57, unfortunately, I have had to delete your challenge BLACK BELT WATCH. You cannot make a challenge on a page that has already been deleted. The proper place to go to appeal a deletion is Deletion review. For reference, I have copied your post here.
 * This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... they are some facts :


 * -a lot af journalists in watchmaking industry made some articles about the fact that Black Belt Watch is the only brand to propose a watch for which only money is not enough to buy the watch : it is a fact that people should show a certificate to proove they detends a black belt in martial arts.


 * -it is a fact that BlackbeltWatch reflects and honors the seven virtues, the samurai code of conduct. it is its history, the inspiration of its design.


 * So I do not understand which part can't be approved.

Nobody has disputed the truthfullness of the article. The issue is the promotional language used. "BlackbeltWatch reflects and honors the seven virtues, the samurai code of conduct..." is not a "fact", it is an opinion. It reads exactly like advertising copy designed to promote the watch. Wikipedia must not express opinions in its own voice. At most, we could quote someone else saying that, but in my opinion that would still amount to an attempt to promote the product. Also promotional is "the only luxury watch that money alone can not buy". That might be factual (although no inline citation is provided to back it up) but the whole structure of the sentence is designed to promote rather than inform. I read it as a manufacturer's claim rather than a fact, I am sure that there are many luxury watches in peoples' collections that are not for sale. In short, even if this is an acceptable subject for Wikipedia, the article that has been offered is promotional in structure and would need entirely rewriting from scratch in any case. SpinningSpark 16:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Black Belt Watches, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 220  of  Borg 09:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

I do not understand why it is inappropriate? please could you explain where i am wrong concerning this page thank you

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Belt Watches
Hello Gwladys57,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Belt Watches for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, Gwladys57. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. SpinningSpark 15:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ArtyA


A tag has been placed on ArtyA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

ref
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  18:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)