User talk:Gy20003

AfD Nomination: Yummy (Gwen Stefani song)
An editor has nominated the article Yummy (Gwen Stefani song) for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Articles for deletion/Yummy (Gwen Stefani song). Add four tildes like this &tilde;&tilde;&tilde;&tilde; to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Yummy (Gwen Stefani song) during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 14:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Relax And Take Notes
A tag has been placed on Relax And Take Notes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Geniac 17:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Pourin' Up
I have added a "" template to the article Pourin' Up, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 17:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stunt 101
An editor has nominated Stunt 101, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Yummy_(Gwen_Stefani_song)
A tag has been placed on Yummy_(Gwen_Stefani_song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Yummy_(Gwen_Stefani_song) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Yummy_(Gwen_Stefani_song) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. Pan Dan 22:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Wanna Move(Diddy song)
I have added a "" template to the article Wanna Move(Diddy song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hbdragon88 07:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Go Crazy
A tag has been placed on Go Crazy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Geniac 05:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Akon Discography
I'd like to know why all of the worldwide charts were taken down and replaced with US Charts only. I dont think that it is a good idea because Akon's songs are charted worldwide. The discography page should not be limited to ONLY the US Charts. I'd like to know why you removed them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Taker 1192 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC).

AfD nomination of Rubberband Man
An editor has nominated Rubberband Man, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Blow It Up
An editor has nominated Blow It Up, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Trap or Die (song)
An editor has nominated Trap or Die (song), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Trap Star
An editor has nominated Trap Star, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of And Then What
An editor has nominated And Then What, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tuck Ya Ice
An editor has nominated Tuck Ya Ice, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Two Miles An Hour
An editor has nominated Two Miles An Hour, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nike Aurr's and Crispy Tee's
An editor has nominated Nike Aurr's and Crispy Tee's, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Preview
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. --Geniac 01:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Tity Boi
I have added a "" template to the article Tity Boi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  19:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary usage
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 00:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

50 Cent discography
Hi Gy. Just a minor note. When editing headings, you don't need to start every word with capitals like "Solo Singles" (see WP:HEAD). The only words that should be in capitals are special words like pronouns e.g. "The Game". Spellcast 16:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Slim Thug discography
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Slim Thug discography, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Slim Thug discography seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Slim Thug discography, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pitbull discography
A tag has been placed on Pitbull discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c) 05:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pitbull discography
A tag has been placed on Pitbull discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pitbull discography
Pitbull discography, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pitbull discography satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Pitbull discography and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Pitbull discography during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Spellcast 15:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jazze Pha discography
Sorry about that! The page was empty when I tagged it. Glad to see you were adding content. In the future, consider using the in-use template when you're working on a new article so it won't get tagged for deletion. Keep up the good work! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Rumor
Is fake, sorry to crush your dreams but I'm not buying it. Ellomate (talk) 06:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lil Flip discography
A tag has been placed on Lil Flip discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Sting_au   Talk  03:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pitbull discography
A tag has been placed on Pitbull discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pitbull discography
A tag has been placed on Pitbull discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny - m t  07:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. ''You were warned about this the last time you created this article, too. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tags from articles you have created.'' jonny - m  t  07:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Webbie discography
An article that you have been involved in editing, Webbie discography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.  Manderson198   (sprech)  18:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

50 Cent discography
Hi Gy, I reverted your edits because you removed a lot of the charts, featured singles, and refs without explaining. Please don't remove them because this is the standard format. If you have questions, just leave a message. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 01:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gorilla Zoe discography
A tag has been placed on Gorilla Zoe discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Menti  fisto  01:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Quick question
Why do edits like these? Isn't it kind of pointless to say "featuring Jamie Foxx" in every line? Spellcast (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rappingwonders (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Rappingwonders (talk) 20:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Go DJ!
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Go DJ!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Go DJ!. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  16:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pitbull discography
A tag has been placed on Pitbull discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny - m t  16:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Flo Rida discography
An article that you have been involved in editing, Flo Rida discography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Flo Rida discography. Thank you. Udonknome (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. --Geniac (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Big Boi discography
A tag has been placed on Big Boi discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

"Holla at Me"
FYI: The "Holla at Me" article you created has been moved to Holla at Me (song) per naming conventions. You could have created the article at the Holla at Me redirect page that already existed. You may want submit move request to move the page over the redirect. In the mean time, can you add some references to the song stub to establish its notability so it doesn't get redirected back to the album? If you need help, feel free to ask. Thanks. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

T-Pain production discography
A tag has been placed on T-Pain production discography, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of What It Do
I have nominated What It Do, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/What It Do. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  S R X  01:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gorilla Zoe discography
I have nominated Gorilla Zoe discography, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Gorilla Zoe discography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 16:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Go DJ!
An article that you have been involved in editing, Go DJ!, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Go DJ!. Thank you. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  18:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Rumors
Do not add rumors to Wikipedia without valid sources backing up the rumors. And even with valid sources, the addition of rumors to Wikipedia articles are often disputed on Wikipedia.

Also, we go by last names here in articles for real-life people, not first names. After mentioning Aubrey O'Day's first name, for example, we then go by her last name of O'Day only. Flyer22 (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Hotcrocodile (talk) 12:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. &sup;&deg; Hot CROCODILE ...... (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Several other editors have questioned your bold-facing various content. WP:MOSBOLD warns against using bold except in a few specific cases. Is this one of them? Is there some other meaning you are assigning to bold in your edits that is mentioned somewhere else? DMacks (talk) 23:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Tiptoety talk 06:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 21:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Jeremih (album)
Hey there, noticed you added the album's debut on the Billboard 200. I can't seem to find this on Billboard; can you point out where you found this information? Thanks in advance. (Automated note: Please make sure to reply here on your talk page, as I have it on my watchlist. Thank you.) —  Σ xplicit  17:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 04:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Real Chance of Love (season 2) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

"Everything, Everyday, Everywhere"
Please do not break redirects to articles of non-notable songs, as you did with Everything, Everyday, Everywhere. This article is redirected because it fails to meet the criteria of our inclusion guideline. As is specifically states here, ''Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable''. The song doesn't meet our inclusion criteria, and therefore must redirect to Loso's Way if and when it becomes notable. Thank you. —  Σ  xplicit 22:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

 * 1) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  JBsupreme (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page,  you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  JBsupreme (talk) 09:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  It appears you are still disrupting articles and adding dubious content that is not and in many cases cannot be sourced.  PLEASE STOP IT.  JBsupreme (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced album sales
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —  Σ  xplicit 18:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —  Σ  xplicit 06:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Warning this guy is pointless. Look how many other warnings he's received.  His talk page is full of them.  JBsupreme (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Source Presents: Hip Hop Hits, Vol. 9
A tag has been placed on The Source Presents: Hip Hop Hits, Vol. 9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CorpITGuy (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Lil Wayne discography charted guest appearances
Please stop removing such tracks as "Barry Bonds", "Intuition", and others from the Lil Wayne discography singles section on guest appearances. Just because they charted on the bubbling under charts doesn't mean they should be excluded! Andrewlp1991 (talk) 02:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —  Σ  xplicit 20:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Rebirth (Lil Wayne album)
Hey could you give a source for you sales totals to Rebirth (Lil Wayne album) your numbers seem real but im just wondering if you make them up or if you get them from somewhere. STAT -Verse 23:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Source for edits on The Darkside Vol. 1
Hi, I noticed you didn't provide any reference citation when you made your edit to The Darkside Vol. 1 (which I've reverted). What source did you use? Regards, &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jazze Pha production discography
I have nominated Jazze Pha production discography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jazze Pha production discography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1   (talk2me)  16:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Rolling Papers (Wiz Khalifa album). Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Watch the Throne. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Watch the Throne appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 2011 in hip hop music. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Your recent series of edits added new information without any sources, and changed sourced information without paying any attention to verifiability (and you replaced a higher-selling album with a lower one, with no explanation). Please be more careful and pay attention to the details. Thanks. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk)'' 17:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2011 in hip hop music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Why would you make an unsourced and non-sensical edit under "Highest first-week sales" replacing an album with sourced sales of 135,000 by another one with only 128,000? Please add only sourced content, and once again, please use an edit summary for your changes. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk)'' 09:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Young Jeezy discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballin' (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in hip hop music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Faded and Far Away (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. When you recently edited HYFR (Hell Ya Fucking Right), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birdman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in hip hop music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 NBA season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

AJ Lee
Hi. Please remember to include a citation of a reliable source when adding material to articles, as with this edit of yours to AJ Lee. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in hip hop music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back in Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Kanye West. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, please use an edit summary when making potentially challengeable changes to articles, as your edits were challenged here. Minor, typographical changes like spelling errors do not require much explanation, but it is good practice to include a brief summary before saving your changes, as it lets other editors understand your intentions and whether they were deliberatly disruptive or simply mistakes (WP:FIES). Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did here to Game (rapper). Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did here to Big Sean. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did here at 2 Chainz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2 Chainz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 01:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did here to TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2012), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by introducing incorrect information against cited sources in articles, as you did here at 2 Chainz discography, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 21:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did here to TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2012). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 03:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did here at Jamie Foxx discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Block declined
You may find this discussion interesting to follow. I would recommend that you begin using references. If you are uncomfortable with formatting references, this page User:Jeepday/Cite may help. If even that is to much at the very least you should include the source in your edit comments. Jeepday (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Mjs1991. I noticed that you made a change to an article, CM Punk, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mjs1991 (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Rumble (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ricardo Rodriguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Miz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Primo and Darren Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Loso's Way 2: Rise to Power because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  STATic  message me!  00:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elimination Chamber (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ricardo Rodriguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ASAP Rocky discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Edits like this one, where you edit an article to include figures that contradict the sources used to verify the figures are unacceptable. I see that you have been warned numerous times about similar edits. If I see you perform another such edit, I will block you from editing.&mdash;Kww(talk) 06:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for modifying figures in articles to contradict the sources in articles, as seen here. You have been warned many times, including the warning I above where I told you that you would be blocked if you continued. Any admin can unblock this editor when he agrees not to update figures without updating the sources currently used in the article to support the change.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Kww(talk) 05:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)