User talk:Gyan Veda

edit summaries
Greetings! I notice you've been doing a lot of really solid work on the Princeton University article, which is great to see. However, you might want to consider adding summaries of your edits as you make them in the "edit summary" box, as it lets those of us who follow a particular article to see a quick summary of what you've added. There's information about edit summaries here. It's not a big deal if you don't use them, but it's generally considered sort of "good manners" on Wikipedia if you do. Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 15:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Green Hall Historical.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Green Hall Historical.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Psych
I see people --including me--have been rather critical. Perhaps you need to rethink, and take a much more deliberate and extensive approach. If I can help, let me know DGG (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

wikipedia nuggets from someone with similar experience
I've had a 4 year love, long period of hate, then gradual acceptance of wikipedia on a general level. I haven't written an article in about a year and a half after the holier-than-thou cabal of wikipedia overlords finally annoyed me so much my charity was obviously not welcome. Anyways, my summer jobs lack of things to do finally drew me back and I decided to write an article about my university college (University of Texas at Austin College of Communication) because not much information existed and the serach engine optimization capabilites of wikipedia will mean every potential applicant who has an internet connection will read my work and also hopefully increase the awareness of the awesome film school I'm in.

Of course nothing in life is original so I tried to follow the formatting and wording of other succesful college articles when I stumbled upon you're work and the FA review from hell. I've learned personal satisfaction is all you can hope for on wikipedia because the FA even GA process is such an anal teeth pulling affair. So to conclude, if you ever make it back to wikipedia, maybe after a year or so of cooling off, you've got a friend. Andman8 (talk) 18:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey no problem. I'm pretty much fluent in the mediawiki language and more importantly in the bs that runs this place. Wikipedia is pretty much identical to communism in that it looks fantastic on paper yet unfortunately people are fallible creatures. The dirty little secret is that anyone can edit yet an elite minority much like the pigs in animal farm (I promise I'll stop with the third rate metaphors) rule with an iron fist. But the idea of Wikipedia is bulletproof. I actually started up a now defunct internet business using the wikipedia architecture but instead people owned their own pages with no exclusivity factors such as notability and were allowed to embed google ads; but alas it never caught on. O and I noticed an image of yours was deleted, basically if an image is not ported over from wikimedia commons it will be deleted even if it has iron clad licensing, again more arbitrary rules no one ever tells you about --- but I think the end result is ultimately worth it if you look at your work as public service.

O and I facebooked gyan veda and think I found you so if you get a request from a "garrett minks" feel free.

Andman8 (talk) 02:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikpedia politics
You wrote:

"The dirty little secret is that anyone can edit yet an elite minority much like the pigs in animal farm"

Just got here - well I've been before but only beginning to try to contribute. Amusing :-) --Andy Fugard (talk) 16:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Psychology of reasoning in Princeton University Department of Psychology article
Hi there! I replied on my talk page. --Andy Fugard (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Department of Psychology listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Department of Psychology. Since you had some involvement with the Department of Psychology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Churn and change (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Green Hall Colloquium Room.jpg


The file File:Green Hall Colloquium Room.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:Green Hall Main.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Green Hall Computer Lab.jpg


The file File:Green Hall Computer Lab.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Green Hall Drawing.jpg


The file File:Green Hall Drawing.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:Green Hall Library.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Green Hall Case Study Room.jpg


The file File:Green Hall Case Study Room.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Green Hall Main2.jpg


The file File:Green Hall Main2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)