User talk:Gym Gordon

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Gym Gordon, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to East Turkestan independence movement seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalo Yasir


A tag has been placed on Khalo Yasir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carter Herron


A tag has been placed on Carter Herron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Thank you for your work. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:


 * contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
 * is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
 * is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

✅ block evasion as. --Yamla (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Raising Awareness of Lack of Access. I am blocked from contributions so I'll leave this note.
There is a Wikipedia article titled Why Wikipedia is not so great the url being https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is_not_so_great The article mentions: "Wikipedia is not a democracy, and its editors may face numerous restrictions on freedom of speech, including various types of sanctions. Editors can be indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia if their usernames do not conform to Wikipedia's username policy." Ironic how this one isn't considered disruptive editing but here you go. I always thought Wikipedia was diverse. I have a theory that my ban is either due to an opposition towards a certain idea, perspective, or maybe even racism about the fact that I made edits suggesting I either have knowledge of certain cultures or are a part of. But yeah, Wikipedia definitely ain't diverse like I thought. Some administrators definitely engage in censorship. The power structure should be changed to make sure that admins are approved by the top people in Wikipedia whether it be founders, CEO, etc. I sincerely acknowledged my disruptive edits and my mistakes, and I acknowledge my warning now. However, they accuse me of block evasion even though long before this block I had multiple accounts, to be honest I don't recall why. Maybe I forgot about one account or maybe I wanted another account to give myself a restart and become a big contributor. Nonetheless, they act as if I made the other accounts following the ban. It seems the admins must've seen some political statement or perspective they didn't like and banned me for years but used "disruptive editing" as an excuse. There's no reason I shouldn't be unblocked following acknowledging my vandalism, though my intent wasn't so, other than they have other grudges that they do not mention. Lack of accountability and transparency is what I call it. Gym Gordon (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Wassup User:Yamla and User:jpgordon Gym Gordon (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.