User talk:GypsyGuitarMan

Welcome!
Hello, GypsyGuitarMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Conspiracy theories related to the Trump-Ukraine scandal does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 20:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''If you have legitimate issues with the phrasing of that sentence, I recommend you create a thread on the articles talk page seeking other user's input. I looked at the sources and I don't see any evidence that the administration didn't promote different conspiracy theories.'' ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 20:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Actually I did make it neutral by stating allegedly


 * In cases where there's public documentation of somebody doing something (which there is here, you can read the sources and verify for yourself), changing the phrasing to "allegedly" casts doubt on the legitimacy of those claims and could be interpreted as a pro-Trump bias on Wikipedia. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 20:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)