User talk:Gyregimble

Welcome to my Talk Page. Officially started on July 19, 2019. Gyregimble (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Gyregimble, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome Gyregimble! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, Gyregimble. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 02:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Women in Red
Hi there, Gyregimble, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have someone interested in covering tax lawyers. For a new contributor, you already seem to have become quite a proficient editor, making good progress on Joanne Garvey. Nevertheless, if you want to gain further experience in editing, I recommend The Wikipedia Adventure. For women's biographies, you might also like to look at our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. If Garvey is not approved within the next few days, drop a message on my talk page and I'll help you out. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Edit at Tax
Hi! I don't understand why you removed the archive-urls with this edit. Could it have been a mistake? Sjö (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know. I am very sorry. I have no idea how that happened. I simply wanted to correct "individuals" to "an individual's." It absolutely was a mistake. Please let me know if there is anything I can or should do to fix it. Should I undo my edit, or has it already been corrected? Do you happen to know what I did to cause such a removal--is there some random button I accidentally hit? Gyregimble (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know what caused it, but did you perhaps try some editing software or some kind of bot supposed to maintain references? I've seen that some of those can cause unexpected changes.
 * As for fixing it, your edit couldn't be undone easily because other editors have edited the same text as you. You could open the "View history" tab, and open the edit before yours (00:42, 16 November 2019 by‎ El C). Then, click "Edit" and make your changes. Go back to the history tab, find the edits by TAnthony and InternetArchiveBot ("prev" links) and apply their changes again. Then everything should be the way you intended. Sjö (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March 2020 at Women in Red
== Your submission at Articles for creation: Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) (March 6) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 06:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gyregimble was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gyregimble&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gyregimble (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Cited to additional sources to support topic. Added that law has been adopted in Utah, and that bills are pending in Kansas and Tennessee. Gyregimble (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) has been accepted
 Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  DGG ( talk ) 16:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfC notification: Draft:American College of Tax Counsel has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:American College of Tax Counsel. Thanks! Ant a nO 03:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the new Articles for Creation submission Draft:American College of Tax Counsel. I did my best to revise the description of the organization in order to limit the close paraphrasing. I hope the changes are sufficient. You also mentioned in a comment, "If possible, add inbox." I am not familiar with that, so could you provide me with more detail or point me in the right direction? Gyregimble (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * For the infobox, Fiscale Hogeschool > Infobox university --Ant a nO 21:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Awesome! Thank you! I will learn to do an infobox. Gyregimble (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: American College of Tax Counsel has been accepted
 American College of Tax Counsel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=American_College_of_Tax_Counsel help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Ant a nO 21:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (July 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:American_Academy_of_Matrimonial_Lawyers Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:American_Academy_of_Matrimonial_Lawyers reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the new Articles for Creation submission Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. I did my best to revise the description of the organization in order to highlight the fact that it publishes the most well-respected academic legal journal on the topic of family law in the United States. I also added multiple cites from various third parties referencing the organization and the journal. In addition, I made some minor edits and added an info. box. I hope the changes are sufficient.Gyregimble (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi! The issue here is purely that of notability, which in my view wasn't, and still isn't, met. Please study the notability criteria for organisations, at WP:ORG. Basically, you need to show multiple independent secondary sources discussing this organisation in significant extent and detail. If you feel some of the sources cited already do that, please point them out in case I've missed something. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the additional insight. Per your recommendation, I reviewed the notability criteria at WP:ORG and added cites to Creighton University, Georgetown Law, Richmond Law, and Wisconsin State to support that the AAML's publications—including a major academic journal and national standards of legal practice—are utilized as a primary resource for the practice of family law in the United States. I also added cites to multiple independent secondary sources discussing the organization in more detail. I hope this helps from a notability perspective.Gyregimble (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (January 17)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:American_Academy_of_Matrimonial_Lawyers Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:American_Academy_of_Matrimonial_Lawyers reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
Hello, Gyregimble. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Miller (attorney) (January 6)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Miller (attorney) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Miller_(attorney) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cabrils&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Miller_(attorney) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your detailed review and helpful comments. Per your recommendation, I added many additional references to "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Would you be willing to reconsider the subject as a notable academic under Notability (academics)? Gyregimble (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Gyregimble. Well done on the improvements. I'm thinking Miller probably does satisfy Criteria 3, 7 and/or 8. However, the draft was still reading too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not, so I've edited and trimmed the page and sources to what I feel is more appropriate. The Bibliography is still far too long and I would suggest you trim is to the most notable 5-10 publications. If you're content to do that, please ping me and I'd then be happy to accept the page. Again, good work! Cabrils (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Miller (attorney) has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Miller (attorney). Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Miller (attorney) has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Justin Miller (attorney), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Justin_Miller_(attorney) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Cabrils (talk) 23:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers


Hello, Gyregimble. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 23:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging