User talk:Gzjthomas10

Welcome
Hello, Gzjthomas10 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Thegooduser  Let's Chat  🍁  01:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Gzjthomas10, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi Jason,

First off, I wanted to say that I agree with your initial review of the "filter bubble" article that you are reviewing. Splitting the reaction section into two separate sections, much like the counter measures section is, would make a lot of sense and probably make the section flow better. One thing I noticed in this same section is that it seems to focus a lot on one Facebook related study and doesn't focus on any other forms of social media. Maybe the research isn't out there but this might be something to look into. The Wiki also references the 2016 political election several times but without delving too deep into how exactly filter bubbles effected the election. --Jgillingham95 (talk) 04:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)