User talk:Gzkn/December 2006

Anti-vandalism
I'm going to give up patroling the RC while you're on the job; every time I go to revert I seem to be in an edit conflict with you! Keep up the good work :) ShakingSpirit talk  12:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

i'm sorry

 * ) B3x ecutioner 12:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Greetings Gzkn
Hi Gzkn. I'm a novice contributor who recently initiated the page Antediluvian Rocking Horse. I notice you recommended the page for deletion. As a frequent and avid wikipedia user, I think this content is worthy of inclusion. But, as a newbie, I could, of course, be horriby wrong! I'd be so grateful if you could tell me where I went wrong and how I might improve the quality of the article. Have a great day - or night! (One is never sure with global time differences.)--Hrazer 13:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

my bad
sorry —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.35.75.22 (talk • contribs). Gzkn 07:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Conan O'Brian
I was just reading some articles doing some minor wiki-gnome stuff with Conan O'Brian in the backround and I decided to do something funny (stupid funny). Anyways, I deleted it less than 30 seconds later.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 08:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

careful!
You missed vandalism on Casino Royale (2006 film) article - you reverted to EnsRedShirt version, while the vandalism had been deleting whole sections of article version by 2006-12-02T13:30:18 Chris 42. Please be more careful ;) Valters 15:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Gentrification
Sorry about that, I thought that the page had been almost deleted, so I reverted to restore it... That "delete" (where it says that there is no article for "Gentrification" might have been caused by wikipedia loading error.GoldDragon 03:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Warning templates
You gave Iandoh2 a test1 for editing Template:X5, saying "Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do" - um, Template:X5 is a sandbox :-). Of course, he removed the line saying 'please do not remove this line', but if you want to warn him about that then test1 is just going to be confusing. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Rachel Marsden
Your recent edit to Rachel Marsden (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Changing pages without good reason
I sincerely hope this user does not become an editor as he/she just changes pages without even leaving a reason,

This is one example

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flower_of_Life

A complaint has been issued against you. Neutral2006 20:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support
The article Joseph W. Tkach was promoted to FA on 3 December with a 4-0 result. Many thanks for your comments and support! I hope to bring more articles to FAC soon. --RelHistBuff 10:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Closing XfDs
When closing an XfD where the actions was carried out by someone else, it's always good to make that explicit. 152.91.9.144 06:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It doesn't happen often enough for a de facto standard to emerge, so the text you proposed would be fine. I'd tend to provide the link to the log as well, and a note on the closer's page telling them that you've done so.  (That's if they are a new adimn or don't close too many XfDs, there's no point reminding someone who has simply forgotten because they already closed forty that day.) 152.91.9.144 07:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Whoops sorry about the xfD's
I was clearing out the CAT:CSD backlog, we had over 200 articles on it. Sorry if I speedied somethings and forgot to check for the afd. Thanks for telling me though. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 07:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Repost speedies
Hi there. You nominated pirate metal for speedy deletion as a repost. However, it was previously deleted as an improbable redirect, and not per an XfD discussion. If you read the current text of the repost criterion, you'll note that WP:CSD only applies to pages deleted in XfD. Let me know if you have any questions. -- SCZenz 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, you were right and I was wrong. The confusion is due to the AfD deleting Pirate metal, and the current article being Pirate Metal (note capitalization).  Your tagging was correct; I'd go ahead and delete now, but I don't have time to close the AfD properly at the moment (which I ought to do if I delete the article).  Sorry about that. -- SCZenz 03:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Firestarter (song)
Why was my contribution deleted? I thought it was wholly appropriate to link to a reference video of that reference. VarunRajendran
 * Moved to bottom and signed Gzkn 07:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Serial Experiments Lain
Hi! I see you don't mind copy edit requests, and I read that you're real good at it. Serial Experiments Lain is not yet of excellent quality, but it's going through FAC, and its prose is the main grief held against it. Would you mind having a look to see how it can improve? That would be most appreciated.--82.151.87.22 12:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the unsigned comment. Yes, that was me. Seeing the work you're putting in Peter Jennings, it's no wonder you can't help! Thanks anyway. Would you by any chance know someone who could be interested in the subject, with some copyedit experience? Lain is quite an obscure subject, and only Deckiller went through it for now.--SidiLemine 11:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

VCN access
Hi Gzkn, apologies I was just in a meeting when you popped into #vcn-request - you are now approved for #vandalism-en-wp :) Thanks again!  Glen  09:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Hit the Ice (film)
I see that you added a request that the trivia section be "cleaned up". Could you elaborate as to why you think it needs cleaning? There are only 5 pieces of trivia, and none of them belong in the only other section on the page (Plot). Where do you suggest that it goes? To start a new section for only 1 item, ie: moving the Raiders of the Lost Ark comment to another area such as "Cultural References" or something similiar seems ridiculous for only one item. Please cite some reasons or reevaluate your secision to put the Cleanup tag. Donaldd23 23:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

El Greco
Thanks! Could you possibly check the last paragraph of "Early years and family" that I rewrote for any prose deficiencies. Oh! And what is IRC?! (As you may have realized, I have a problem with cut words!)--Yannismarou 07:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:AIV
Added that report accidentally when trying out my new RC Patrol tool. Sorry for the trouble. --Naveen (talk) 11:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits on Venus (band)
Hello, I actually created the page and wrote everything for it and I was deciding whether or not to add the links to label websites at the bottom for the album checklist. Kal 12:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your quick response. No trouble at all as their weren't any changes made I just thought I'd point out the mistake. In addition, keep up the good work on your Wiki patrol in keeping vandalism off of articles. Kal 13:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I forgot to mention that if you are on patrol could you please see that this IP - 194.158.74.3 does not edit my user page any longer? I believe that is strictly forbidden with the exception of admin control. Kal 13:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Anti-vandal toolset?
Wow, you're sure fast when you're on anti-vandal duty. What tools do you use? dpotter 02:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I use Lupin's anti-vandal tool. It's pretty amazing. There's also vandal proof, but for some reason, it doesn't work for me... Gzkn 02:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I've been using Vandal Fighter 3, with Lupin's popups for reverts. It's great, except that I'm forever manually dropping warnings templates onto vandal userpages, and I'd like to find a way to automate that. You're so fast, I am guessing you may have found some automation for that. dpotter 02:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Penus
OK. :] Szoferka 02:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Scouting FAC
Many thanks for your precise suggestions on this FAC. I'll work it more myself, but if you have more precise suggestions, I'd really appreciate it. Rlevse 13:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw your inline questions and have hopefully successfully dealt with them. Many thanks for this and any future help. Rlevse 12:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Feminism Vandal
I went ahead and reported him to WP:AIAV now that he violated the final warning.

By the way, do you know if 3RR applies to us in cases like this? The edits are definitely POV and quite possibly trolling, but not blatant vandalism. – Lantoka (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I am really surprised that nobody thinks feminism is subject to vandalism - today has broken all records there. It is not lost on me that feminism was born out of abusive behaviour by males, and the feminism article has been the continual target of hate edits. I'm rapidly developing a zero tolerance for vandals. --Mgoodyear 21:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, unfortunately most of today's vandalism was probably by a single vandal, which doesn't help our case for semi-protection. – Lantoka (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

New to Wikipedia
Hi I saw that you made an edit to an article I put up this morning courtesy signer. Thank you! I'm new to Wikipedia so any advice or help is surley welcome. I don't want to do anything thats out of line.

--Swift Access 14:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Adam D. Hunt (Managing Member) Swift Access, LLC

My bad
Revert it back. When it looks questionable, has no references, and no edit summary, it is really hard to tell. Kukini 02:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

thx
Left a message at his/her talk page User_talk:Dmacw6. Tony 05:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Moral horificies on Wikipedia
Dear GZKN

I am very cross with you. I am not in the habit of being reverted. That was an obscenity I removed from that page (I cannot bring myself to name it) your reversion of my prudent edit was an affront. That may be how you behave in your part of the world, but let me tell you, it is not how we behave in Mississippi. The world is a beautiful place, and young children not to mention "Our Lord" do not want to read about unseemly bodily functions whilst researching their assignments. Now please remove the offensive material at once. Thank you!

Sincerely yours

Catherine de Burgh 09:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Here is the link to your edit: . I fail to see the "obscenity" that you removed. Gzkn 09:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I am not only horrified by you response but totally disgusted. I am posting your  rude response to me above to keep everything in context, so that the authorities who run the internet can understand the gravity of my complaint when I report it.  I think you should understand such infringements of God's own moral law, could lead to Wikipedia being closed down.  Reflect on your own part in this and repent.  I should warn you that I am close friend of the former British premier Margaret Thatcher - who will take a very dark  view of your behaviour indeed. Catherine de Burgh 09:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Lead
I'm glad you've read it, that's two of us. I've also been involved in discussions there. As you may know the guidelines as to how long per context are vague and though I think it would be good to bring up a discussion to come to a consensus on just how long is long, for what and where, but others have advised against it. They are probably right and we just have to use our sense when it comes to deciding how long the lead should be on a particular subject. Regards helium, i tagged it since most other elements have much shorter leads such as sodium, potassium, zinc, boron. As for FrummerThanThou 15:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, if the other article's LAEDs need lenthening, I'll leave you to it. It's your feild and you reckon people interested will want a certain ammount of detail in the lead. Your input into the aticles with short leads would be appreciated. p.s. I often put the up to feel out the area, there is no real way of me knowing every garden is tended to. Cheers FrummerThanThou 00:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You're getting rather harsh. You can see my contributions, I don't go around tagging multiple articles, yes I am on the lookout though. I have read WP:LEAD it a number of times, it itself needs to be lengthened. I will soon be making a template for Leads that are not long enough, or not "all inclusive". I only tag articles where the lead is overwhelming. I make mistakes, since some topics people are overly interested in. Since the Wikipedia 1.0 CD, is going to only include the lead, I have to make sure the Lead includes as much information as possible and that it is all inclusive. I hope you understand, thanks for your feedback. FrummerThanThou 01:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll let you know when its up. p.s. I did go on a 'random article' spree that day, as apposed to browsing. FrummerThanThou 01:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * has arrived! use in good health. Please discuss whether the message is ok, ok talk page there. FrummerThanThou 01:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Barack Obama
My apologies. My issue wasn't his status as the 5th African American Senator ever, but the part about that office saying so. It's not necessary to put that in the sentence there; there's a reference link at the end and even if there weren't, it's a fact that isn't exclusive to that source. Just H 07:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

No Biggie
If anybody's got a problem with removing the U.S. Senate Historical Office part(that's what I think should be removed, and it's not really relevant to anything), we can talk with them. I have no interest getting into that race stuff. Thank you for the heads up though! And good job by the way trying to keep the peace on that talk page, it looked very nasty.Just H 07:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It still has the link there, but i'll leave it be. I'm not looking to create problems. Wikipedia definately has a problem with situations like these. I wish there was a better method to fix them. Just H 15:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

A.C. Milan
Thanks for reverting it back. I'm in a class and can't keep doing it. Landus Mikain 13:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Jennings picture
Re: request on Wizardry Dragon's talk page, I told him I'd take care of it... though it's a bit late (apologies) the image has been uploaded and is now on Peter Jennings' page. Sorry again for the delay! — E ditor at L arge  ( speak )  23:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Prashant Bisht
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Gzkn! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, and try to reinsert the link again. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 13:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The Whale Must Live!
This is a topic very dear, believe it or not, to the citizens of Andover, New Jersey. It is very important to them, and Matt Stern. Now, I believe that there is no harm in allowing a simple article to exist in peace. It is no controversial subject nor alteration of information, but a comic book that a 15 year old devotes so much time to write. Please, let us keep the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savethewhale (talk • contribs) 13:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

SaveThe Whale
As the creator of this page, I assure you that, while it may seem to be a mess, it is really a work in progress. The subject is obscure and not well known at all, so internet sources are hard to come by. I am busy, but have been making updates constantly. I will continue to do so IF GIVEN TIME. I beg for your leniency. I must go now but I will most likely contact you in the future. Thank you for your time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WileyCoyotey (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC).


 * Just in case you didn't notice, this guy and the one above are sockpuppets who only created Waiting Game apart from their edits here.--SidiLemine 16:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Claude Moore trivia
Oh - I don't mind... You're right - this is great folklore about the farm that I just thought I'd try to include. My girlfriend was witness to the event I mentioned. But you're right - it WAS a stretch...

I'm intrigued by how closely you were watching the changes - I hadn't had the comment listed very long at all...

Mark (listening to Reggae as I type this) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mark Sublette (talk • contribs) 08:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC). Mark Sublette 08:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette 08:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

But here I run head-long into the grey area of documentable research. I can speak knowlegeably about the Turkey Run Farm through nearly two decades of association, but in the case of the Virginia Aviation Museum article, which I created, my source was the actual placards for the exhibits, but I can't site a published source. The museum does not publish a document that has all the data on the display signs.

But does that make my research any less valid?

Mark (still jammin', jammin', we hope you like jammin' too...)

Chess FAR
These editors have made a massive and commendable effort to save Chess from FARC, but they need copyedit help. I'm not a great copyeditor - looking for any takers. Sandy (Talk) 00:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's really apprecited, Gzkn. Chess was a "brilliant prose" promotion, so none of those editors working on it even get "credit" for the featured article - they just dug in to try and save it when it came up at WP:FAR, so it's very kind of you to help out.  Sandy (Talk) 01:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * How's the copyedit looking? Chess's two-week FAR is up on the 22nd, although extra time is usually given if work is progressing.  Can you weigh in on the FARC?  Sandy (Talk) 18:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Belated thanks
I wanted to thank you for reviewing the Harvard Glee Club article - your suggestions were great and I made a lot of changes based on them. --Dmz5 21:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Moving Pages
It's amazing that we were doing the same thing around the same time. I was starting to get a little confused. Anyway, I'm comfortable with the "and" or without the "and". I think we should leave it up to User:Siriusfarm as to which name is more accurate. Thanks for helping out. Umeboshi 02:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's cool, I just left a comment on his talk page asking him to decide which one he prefers. Whichever one he decides is fine with me, they're both better than the original. :)  Umeboshi 02:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I had neglected to do that to Dave Walsh. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 07:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

re:removing content from the Star Wars comments page
Hi I was just messeging regarding me removing content from Star Wars pages.I edited some of the comments I wrote because I relaise they were unecessary and pointless.I just forgot to sign in that's all.

I edited my own comments.

Thanx.Nadirali 21:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Chess
Thank you for help with Chess. Merry Christmas! --Ioannes Pragensis 10:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Hi my friend! How are you... I am back to Wikipedia to have some fun! Feel free to be "Asher Watchdog". Happy Holidays!

Asher Heimermann 00:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Revert Edit
Why did you change my edit of Barrack Obama? I added a legitmate statement on how he won his election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.221.40 (talk • contribs) Gzkn 05:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for the rv of shaanxiquak's vandalism. saves me the trouble. --Paaerduag 06:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:
Hi Gzkn,

I am confused. Should I be contributing to more articles? There are many articles that I would like to work in the future, but the FA process has me focused on several often-related articles. Or should I change my username? WikiprojectOWU 04:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Feel free to email me at wikip2006@yahoo.com. WikiprojectOWU 04:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what to post. I have put a lot of time to improve articles being aware of many WP policies and most have been very appreciative. This is actually very discouraging. Please email me. WikiprojectOWU 05:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This is all great. Few will think that jumping the gun is a thank-you for many hours I have invested with what I believe are very positive contributions. It is really disappointing. I am sorry. I don't think I can continue contributing if my contributions are treated in this way. WikiprojectOWU 05:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Let me know how to proceed. I will not contribute to WP unless I get some kind of acknowledgement and even apology from the person who started this and see what this is about. This is the kind of action that is definitely discouraging to contributors and for what amount of effort that I have put into WP, it is for me. I am not aware of the editor's history but it seems to me that have is ignoring your comment. WikiprojectOWU 16:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Hengchun Earthquake
Thanks for helping me with renaming the quake. You beat me to editing the intro. I will peruse Chinese language websites later today, but as of right now, I don't see anything online that confirms what I have seen on TV about the increased injury toll. ludahai 魯大海 09:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I noticed the capitalization problem and fixed it. ludahai 魯大海 09:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Noahide Laws
I would love to have the Noahide Laws article featured some time. You hang around area allot. What your take on it? I know it needs allot of improvements, can you give some impartial advice? frummer 20:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

thx
Thanks for correcting a link on my How to find good copy-editors page. I think the page has problems (not good examples, for instance), and will leave it for a while. Tony 13:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thnx
I'll try n see to it! frummer 04:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

B movie colloquy
Howdy. I had no intention of responding hostilely to your original comment. I've looked over what I wrote, however, and I can easily see how it came over that way. I apologize for my clumsiness. Here's what I've written in response to your subsequent comment:
 * Sorry, didn't catch this comment until just now. There was no hostility--I just wanted to be clear whether there had been a revision in the citation requirements I was unaware of. As you suggest, large chunks of text without citation can be a concern, but--as I demonstrated to Jayzel--whether they call for citation or not ultimately has nothing to do with the length but rather with the nature of the content. In the example you give, for instance, (a) the description of Stranger on the Third Floor as the first classic film noir is an opinion widely held in the field, common knowledge to all professionals involved in film noir criticism and American film history in general (as common knowledge as, say, "The Jazz Singer was the first feature-length film with live-recorded dialogue"--does that necessitate a citation?), and (b) it has no strong intellectual status, as both (i) the definition of film noir and (ii) the line between "classic" noir and "pre-classic" or "proto-" noir are largely subjective. In both ways, therefore, the statement does not warrant a citation--not only is it material that is easily verifiable by any interested layman via simple reference to a wide range of published sources, it should not be given the imprimatur of a citation. It's an accurate and relevant observation about a generally held opinion in the field, no more or less. I've changed the wording of the sentence to make that a bit clearer. It was "movies" because...um...I can't type.—DCGeist 09:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow-up I've expanded the paragraph in question to cover more of the general relationship between the realms of film noir and the B movie. In the citation at the end of the graf, I've made sure to include an article that deals with Stranger on the Third Floor as well as the general issue of latter-day popularity.—DCGeist 12:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Best, Dan—DCGeist 22:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thnx
I'll try n see to it! frummer 04:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

B movie colloquy
Howdy. I had no intention of responding hostilely to your original comment. I've looked over what I wrote, however, and I can easily see how it came over that way. I apologize for my clumsiness. Here's what I've written in response to your subsequent comment:
 * Sorry, didn't catch this comment until just now. There was no hostility--I just wanted to be clear whether there had been a revision in the citation requirements I was unaware of. As you suggest, large chunks of text without citation can be a concern, but--as I demonstrated to Jayzel--whether they call for citation or not ultimately has nothing to do with the length but rather with the nature of the content. In the example you give, for instance, (a) the description of Stranger on the Third Floor as the first classic film noir is an opinion widely held in the field, common knowledge to all professionals involved in film noir criticism and American film history in general (as common knowledge as, say, "The Jazz Singer was the first feature-length film with live-recorded dialogue"--does that necessitate a citation?), and (b) it has no strong intellectual status, as both (i) the definition of film noir and (ii) the line between "classic" noir and "pre-classic" or "proto-" noir are largely subjective. In both ways, therefore, the statement does not warrant a citation--not only is it material that is easily verifiable by any interested layman via simple reference to a wide range of published sources, it should not be given the imprimatur of a citation. It's an accurate and relevant observation about a generally held opinion in the field, no more or less. I've changed the wording of the sentence to make that a bit clearer. It was "movies" because...um...I can't type.—DCGeist 09:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow-up I've expanded the paragraph in question to cover more of the general relationship between the realms of film noir and the B movie. In the citation at the end of the graf, I've made sure to include an article that deals with Stranger on the Third Floor as well as the general issue of latter-day popularity.—DCGeist 12:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Best, Dan—DCGeist 22:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Copediting
Hello Gzkn: after talking to Tutmosis, I was wondering if you could copyedit the Enter the Wu-Tang article. I want it to be a featured article and all of the help I can get is appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noahdabomb3 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC).

Welcoming
I see you do a fair bit of welcoming. Please can I ask you to use my welcome123 template so as to help with my research into new user trends. The template puts the new user into Category:WelcomeBotResearch where we analyse their progress, activity vandalism etc. Cheers. frummer 22:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)