User talk:H-DHAMI

Image tagging for File:Speed Records Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Speed Records Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello H-DHAMI, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Speed Records (label) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  14:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Indic script in lead
Hi there, I know you mean well with edits like this and this, but please note that per WP:INDICSCRIPT, the community prefers that we not use Indic scripts in the lead. There have been a lot of cases where people would fight over which Indic scripts should be included. "Should we use Hindi here? But the Telugu people invented ___ so we should use Telugu. No, the Tamil people invented that, so we should use Tamil!" Obviously some articles were more problematic than others, but the net result is that we typically avoid Indic script in the lead. And in the Infobox as well. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Speed Records Logo.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Speed Records Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  15:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

CSD
Hi there, many thanks for your help reviewing new pages. Wikipedia should be a welcoming place for new users, that's why new articles should not normally be CSD'd immediately after creation. There should be a 10-15 minute gap after creation to allow editors build an article and add relevant information. There is no rush to delete articles for "benign" issues such as notability. Of course, if there are copyright issues or an article is defamatory, it should be tagged straight away and there is no need to wait. If you have any questions, pls let me know. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Dhami, with your lack of experience editing at Wikipedia, and your lack of familiarity with our policies and content guidelines, I don't think it's a terribly wise idea to leap into the world of article deletion nominations. Perhaps getting your toes wet in more basic areas of editing until you've become more experienced would be a good idea? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

- −	 Ok next time I will made a gafe of 10-15 minutes.thanking you! (H-DHAMI (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC))

Ok I will edit and create page only and not adding any deletion nomination next time.now are you happy? (H-DHAMI (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of White Hill Music (record label)


The article White Hill Music (record label) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nothing in article to demonstrate notability. Sources are minimal and article originally included sources that weren't remotely connected to article subject."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of White Hill Music (record label) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Hill Music (record label) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/White Hill Music (record label) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire ( talk ) 01:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)