User talk:H12345678r

Christian Identity
I've reverted you. We need secondary sources meeting WP:VERIFY and WP:RS I'm afraid. And Nazis lie, Finck's a good example. Here he makes it clear he wants to get rid of Jews and Blacks."When we get enough of these Negro and Jewish frauds out in the eye of the public, perhaps sufficient Whites may seriously ponder the necessity for their own survival, to rid the world of Negroes and Jews." It is possible an article could be written on the organisation but it would have to meet WP:ORG and although I can see mentions such as but that's just a mention of his racist forum. I also found his conviction for murder. Doug Weller  talk 11:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history at Charlemagne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CycloneYoris talk! 23:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I have already added an entry to the talk page. Please actually check the talk page before suggesting it. Hansel reinhart (talk) 23:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your edits on Charlemagne. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to '''being blocked from editing You have now been reverted already 4 times. You risk getting a block if you persist. Saschaporsche (talk) 09:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)