User talk:H2O is H2O2 is H2O4

I need to be adopted. I am a poor editor. Is there anyone that will adopt little me? An IQ test will be given to adopters. :)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dopamine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dopamine was changed by H2O is H2O2 is H2O4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863655 on 2015-11-16T22:37:34+00:00.

The sub-brain of lesser vertebrates is inferior to the human basal ganglia and while the previous editors did miss this fact, and I added it in brevity, it is certainly not abusive to add correct information that was already included within the given source provided by a previous editor. Please revert your decision because I find it to be wholly abusive and I tire of being bullied on WP just because one Admin wants to harass me and contacts his/her friends to do so.


 * I never commented and this is a distinct attack by an Admin and a source of privacy invasion frowned upon by WP.


 * Cluebot is an automated script. It's not an admin, and it doesn't have friends to sic on you. Meters (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Meters, I disagree. Cluebot is an automated systems with a function wholly operated by human administration of WP, and as such can be sought to attack any individual editor. Look at each of my edits and see if you find any error or malfunction within even one of them. Thank you for your time.

Problem edits
Hi. So far virtually all of your edits have had to be reverted because they are either wrong or incomprehensible or ungrammatical. I don't know what the problem is, but this mustn't continue, as it is creating a lot of work for other editors. Is there anything we can do to help? Looie496 (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sodium dithionite. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 07:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I have never edited that page before.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Elizabeth 2. Enough of the sneaky vcandalism. Meters (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Why am I being bullied?

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Virtually all edits from this account are factually incorrect and/or incoherent to the point of near gibberish. That you do not even know which pages you have edited means you are nowhere near ready to be helping us write an encyclopedia. Others have spent enough time cleaning up after what you have done so far and you seem unable to stop yourself from doing more. DMacks (talk) 08:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Prove it. Show me evidence of your accusal, because all of my edits have been sound, well written and fully accurate.H2O is H2O2 is H2O4 (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * DMacks I have my doubts that this simple incompetence. This edit hid the completely inappropriate word "subterfuge" amidst a typical garbled but arguably well-intentioned edit. It's hard to see how anyone would use "subterfuge" while discussing engine power. Meters (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, it definitely includes behavior at the level of vandalism...it's beyond what I usually see for newbies doing test edits, no question. Malevolence, gross incompentance, and/or violating terms of service by sharing an account and not knowing who's doing what...doesn't matter to me the cause. For example:
 * here talking about steam railroads in medieval times
 * here talking about Catholics in the year 1400 BC
 * Simply WP:NOTHERE at this time. DMacks (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well DMack, perhaps that's because I'm an exceptionally brilliant newbie, and perhaps you will take me under your tutelage and teach me to be a proper Wikipedian?
 * Nope, no evidence of good-faith or reality-based self-awareness evident here. DMacks (talk) 09:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)