User talk:H2o mario

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mexico's Next Top Model, Cycle 2, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mexico's Next Top Model, Cycle 2 was changed by H2o mario (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931723 on 2011-10-30T06:18:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Top Model po-russki, Cycle 3


A tag has been placed on Top Model po-russki, Cycle 3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball  Watcher  01:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amor em Deus


The article Amor em Deus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No referrer emcees. No body text. No clue what the subject actually is.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amor em Deus


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Amor em Deus, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Nthep. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to America's Next Top Model (cycle 20) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NtheP (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Vasilev


A tag has been placed on Mario Vasilev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pam D  14:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi H2o mario, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Stop filling in call-out tables with your bull crap please :) 71.239.172.110 (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BlueMoonset. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Characters of Glee because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You appear to be adding a character that doesn't exist to this article, played by an unknown actor who shares part of your username, "Mario". Deliberately adding false information is disruptive, and ultimately is considered vandalism. Please do not do this again. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BlueMoonset. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Glee (season 5), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Glee (season 5), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Episode titles should never be added without a reliable source. If you don't have one, then wait until you do. Wikipedia doesn't need to be first with rumored titles; it needs to have reliably sourced information about titles (and everything else). BlueMoonset (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at America's Next Top Model (cycle 21). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 08:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 03:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at July 4. TJRC (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Vazil
Hello H2o mario,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mario Vazil for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Timothy Joseph Wood 16:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Peppermint
She is deadnamed in the personal life section. Gleeanon409 (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I see that you are editing the Peppermint article. I'm sending you a message here because there there is a request for comment currently ongoing on her talk page precisely about the inclusion of other names, and I think the discussion would be enriched with your input. cave (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)