User talk:HADRIAN DID NOTHING WRONG

Welcome!
Hi HADRIAN DID NOTHING WRONG! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ian.thomson (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Don't go changing the dates all willy-nilly
Please don't change the format of dates. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Don't go accusing people of "vandalism" when you don't understand what that word means in Wikipedia's context
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to First Jewish–Roman War, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   WhoAteMyButter ( 📬 │ ✏️ ) 05:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at First Jewish–Roman War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Paul Carpenter (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Information icon4.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. This is because of the actions mentioned above. --Paul Carpenter (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Seriously, pay attention
Read WP:Assume good faith until your eyes bleed.

If you keep edit warring to change stuff against site-wide consensuses such as WP:ERA, we're going to have to assume that you have no interest in working with this site's community or our social contracts.

If you go accusing everyone of vandalism, when their edits do not meet this site's definition of vandalism, it's going to become very hard to not think you might be trolling.

Ian.thomson (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)