User talk:HAHA2424/Evaluate an Article

Article link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_(finance)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? - Yes everything in this related to the topic of a BETA in finance. There was not anything that really was distracting to me. There were math equations which I would say did the opposite of distract me.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? - I don't believe the information is out of date knowing these are the equations and thoughts of beta that are common. I think one thing they can add is the use of technology and how that helps the calculations of BETA especially in this new fin-tech world.

What else could be improved? - I think more images. There are 0 Images. I think a picture of what the beta sign looks like or the equation in easy to read photo would be helpful and interesting for the article.

Is the article neutral? - Yes, I don't believe there is any way to be biased in this type of mathematical logic and equations.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? - Yes all of the links correctly work and the sources seem to be all reliable.

What does the talk page look like? - It seems that this article has yet to have anyone start a discussion on this.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? - It says that this article needs more citations for verification. It says that this article is apart of a interest of some wikiprojects