User talk:HAILXSATANX666

As noted in ANI, the name can be considered promotional and combined with your edit history clearly is meant to be promotional, and, again per WP:USERNAME as quoted in the ANI thread, this combination is not acceptable. I wouldn't accept a name "UBERxISxGREAT" from a user who then posts promotional UBER material in a variety of articles, either. Rklawton (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

SPI
I'm giving you a post to let you know that I've opened up an investigation here in regards to whether or not you're the same person as ILOVESATAN666 or Barfbag666. My basic theory is that you're likely the person I emailed at the Temple since your edits are very similar to the suggestions I gave them. The only thing I forgot to tell them, which is sadly very important (and I've repeatedly told people that this was my error), is that I also needed to tell them to be transparent about who you are - namely whether or not you're directly involved with the Temple itself. (IE, member, leader, etc.) Whether or not you're the exact same person as the others has been questioned at the ANI thread. This investigation should answer that and depending on what they find, it will greatly impact the discussion. I'm aware that you're blocked, but hopefully this will at least put that portion to rest one way or another. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)