User talk:HAPAXXAPAH

Notice
Thanks, GABHello! 22:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deli nk (talk) 00:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm MjolnirPants. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits seemed less than neutral to several other editors, and have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

You appear to be editing to advocate for the view that Pyriproxyfen is the cause of the recent spate of microcephaly cases in Brazil. This has not been established -or even investigated- by reputable scientists and does not represent a scientifically accurate view of the issue. While it may turn out to be true at some point in the future, we must wait until reliable medical sources can be found to establish this as a verifiable fact. Until then, it is not appropriate to make this claim on Wikipedia. Thank you. MjolnirPants  Tell me all about it.  02:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)