User talk:HECSU

Futuretrack
I note your creation of the article Futuretrack. I had better refer you to WP:ADVERT, which discusses what articles of this nature should not be. All articles on wikipedia should be verifiable, which means that reliable, published, third party sources should be cited and also be written from a neutral point of view; any of the claims that you make about largest, most important and so on should be backed up by third party sources. Otherwise, large swathes of the article, if not the whole thing, are likely to be removed. If you need any help, feel free to ask for help on the article's talk page, Talk:Futuretrack --Harris 20:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Futuretrack
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Futuretrack, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)