User talk:HEYFANTA

Speedy deletion nomination of Fugl Racing


A tag has been placed on Fugl Racing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mean as custard (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your email message
Hi, I got your email message. Discussion of Wikipedia articles is best kept here on the site - the first point of contact should usually be a person's User Talk page, and you can always leave a message for me on mine, at User talk:Boing! said Zebedee - but now that I have contacted you here I will watch this page, so please place any replies here and I'll see them.

As it's an encyclopedia, Wikipedia only hosts articles about notable subjects, people, teams, etc - it's basically for famous people, not like Facebook and similar sites that can have pages about anyone. Notability must be verified by third party reliable sources - have a look at WP:N for general guidance on notability, WP:V for information on verifiability, and WP:RS to learn about what constitutes reliable sources.

The real problem with the Fugl Racing article is that teams of people playing computer games are generally not considered sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia articles. Although we do have an article about Formula SimRacing, you will note that not even the winning drivers and teams have their own articles (their links would be blue if they did) - though if they have an official web site, that can be included in the "Official Teams Websites" section.

So I really don't think you will have any success retaining a Fugl Racing article - sorry I can't be of more positive help -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)