User talk:HJHolm

HJJHolm
I guess you are User:HJJHolm? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  10:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Is that important? Writing books and articles in peer-reviewed journals takes all of my time. From time to time I controll what wiki has and try to correct it. Have a good 2021. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HJHolm (talk • contribs) 14:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Just wondering. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  19:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Any updating of our knowlege is welcome. Anything else not. We should not be too generous with our data and thus I preferred not to be loggied in generally. Now I am blocked for this. An extreme unfair misuse of power! HJHolm (talk) 07:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Talk:Before Present are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. As did the person you replied to. Doug Weller  talk 10:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC
 * Hello, perhaps I misunderstood these different cases. I try and tried for decennia to serve the readers of wikipedia and nothing else. I now am constantly logged in. Others simply did not reply, while I tried to explain why I could no longer do so in individual cases, which, however, led to blocking me. If you understand this, and have the power to do so, do the readers a favour and unblock. Thank you and all the best.HJHolm (talk) 07:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

(My sentence deleted because background now missing)

HJHolm (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Unfair
I remember struggling for months to bring the "Glottochronology" page up to an international standard, but being constantly vandalized by a Russian chauvinist who would only accept a Russian scientist (his father, also PhD supervisor) as a reference. Nobody helped me and wikipedia. This is how dirtily wikipedia rewards my decades of cooperation and substantial donations. My respect for Bishonen's by far more editions which, however, do not entitle him to require a kotau. In particular, it is extremely unfair and unusual to block somebody unlimited without a formal warning. By the way, I now am persitently logged in.HJHolm (talk) 10:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

You in particular block my updates
I would like to update the Genetics section of the article "Lepenski vir". But your personal sensitivies seem to be more important to you than informative updates in wikipedia. All users are happy now ...HJHolm (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Lie
Beshonen accused me of refusing discussions. This is a lie. I repeatedly stressed that I very much welcome discussions about new and substantiated informations. My time, however, does not allow longwided discussions about personal views.HJHolm (talk) 10:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Final Note
<< This is the "thanks" of two overzealous admins, for my well over 6000 edits in almost a dozen international Wikipedias over decades, who cruelly fail to understand that after all that my time is also limited somewhere, and I once forgot to log in. A great service to all the users who have thanked me for my contributions. This is a short-sighted abuse of power or hypersensitive reaction to criticism. "Show a smart person a mistake and they will thank you. Show a stupid person a fault, and he will insult you." (Lao Tzu, 554 B.C.) Please do not get the idea to delete this.HJHolm (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC) - Hello, Bishonen, PhilKnight,331 dot and the whole hidden KuKluxClan gang, Since I'm hitting a wall of short-sighted, mindless, and limited "Freisler" types here, the account is senseless and I'm logging out forever. The warning to other admins, not to override this block, is exremely undemocratic and dictatorious. Go to hell and be cursed forever and ever. You can delete it, but the curse will follow you in your dreams ans you will never forget it. You left me no other choice. HJHolm (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Today 2A02:8108:9640:1A68:850E:FDF0:59BE:BB49 signing as Hans J. Holm posted a complaint at Help desk. It was clearly about this block.
 * HJHolm gave an unclear answer at and said 'I have only ONE account' in the next section. HJHolm has edited 74 pages. 31 of them have also been edited by HJJHolm. HJHolm modified a talk page post by HJJHolm in . In  HJHolm said: 'I remember struggling for months to bring the "Glottochronology" page up to an international standard'. HJHolm has never edited Glottochronology. HJJHolm has edited it 94 times. It seems clear that HJHolm is HJJHolm. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)