User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 62

Mail
Nothing serious, just didn't feel like putting it on your TP-- SKATER  Is Back 00:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Gosh darn it
I've had an ear infection and I've been confused all week ... sorry I lost track of time, I'm around now if you wanna chat. - Dank (push to talk) 21:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks John. I appreciate that, especially as we've had our occasional disagreements. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, you earned it. --John (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * For the minute, watch and wait. Hope he goes away or that, if he comes back, he gives us enough data for a rangeblock (or possibly a series of rangeblocks). Failing that, BRI and perhaps a few short-term protections if necessary. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   03:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Allow me to add my thanks here as well! With luck, he'll give up and find another hobby.  Cheers! ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive  14:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Terry Jones (pastor)
The above pastor is now receiving further press for having announced that he is running for U.S. president. Can the redirect now be unprotected so that a bio can be written? --William S. Saturn (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it OK if I puke on such a redirect? How does one do virtual puke? I don't want to preempt HJ's judgment, but unfortunately this clown is now, or will soon be, notable enough beyond his one single circus act last year. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Does running for POTUS as a(nother) blatant publicity stunt make one notable? My only hope is that the American voters have sufficient common sense to ignore this *cough* gentleman. But to say any more of my opinion on him would be a gross BLP violation. As to the redirect, I'm invoking the "I'm a volunteer" argument—you're quite welcome to ask another admin, but if I ever touch that page again it will be too soon for my liking. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   03:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, he does have an enormous amount of coverage. As a publicity stunt, it's working pretty well, and that's really what our politics have been reduced to. Do you mind if I release it to the general public? William, will you treat it gently and with due regard to the BLP policies? (Chances are it will have to be semi-protected pretty soon.) Drmies (talk) 16:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, it's done. I've semi-protected it still. Drmies (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

email
TucsonDavid U . S . A . 15:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

ITN

 * Hmm.. and all this (In_the_news/Candidates and In_the_news/Candidates) is not soapboxing which user Detterence continually does? Or is that lord forbid you have no objection so thats alirhgT?!Lihaas (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You know, I'm getting rather annoyed at Deterence's soapboxing. Since the last time you yourself warned him, he has continued to engage in making polemical statements which have provoked comments from other users in WP:ITN/C. He has additionally removed the sections of his talk page that accuse him of doing so. I'm thinking of going to WP:ANI again about this, and I'd like your thoughts before I do so.--WaltCip (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * They seem to have taken the hint to tone it down a bit, and most of their comments in the last day or so have been largely on-topic, so I would advise agaisnt going to ANI for now, but if it continues to be a problem, something will have to be done. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

He has been at it again
If you remember the Blood on the Dance Floor incident, This guy has taken it way too far, as I've said before on how anything I'll tell him, he won't listen. I've warned him twice and told him on countless occasions the rules of Wikipedia such as MOS:TM, correctly sourcing content and consensus. But instead of doing all those things, he still continued to make those disruptions as you've remembered from before. It's time for his block, I'm sick of babysitting this article all because of him, and also note if you remember, I'm not the only one that was having a problem with him. He's been a disruption to several. His ARV report has been filled out by me and if you're quick enough you could probably catch it right now. Some people just don't get it… •  GunMetal Angel   00:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * We tried to come to a consensus with everything in the article, and honestly I thought we did, but he has went out of his way to be a pain in the ass today, and apparently decided to disregard all that was said, and base everything around his own opinion on the matter. - Jer Hit me up 00:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Negros (disambiguation)
Could you please explain this. WP:PTM, which I quoted in the edit summary, clearly says "Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title, or a link that includes the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion." Compare also WP:DDD: "Don’t add every article that contains the title.". The two bird names I removed are exact matches for that; they are never known just as "Negros", but always their full names. Cheers, 212.10.78.48 (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your fast reply. It is appreciated. 212.10.78.48 (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Snowded/GoodDay's sandbox
That is Snowded's sandbox that is a collection of GoodDay's behaviour for future reference, I fail to see how my edit is "unconstructive", I am adding another example of GoodDay's behaviour, which should not be neccessary but is since he has not been prevented from disrupting, shouldn't you be informing him about this rather than "correcting" me?143.239.7.4 (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

These IPs that bring up charges at Snowded's Rfc sandbox, seem like block-evading editors to me. They just barely meet me & suddenly the apparently know my 'history'. GoodDay (talk) 19:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Anyone can look up your history of contributions, and its hard for people not to notice your behaviour, oh and by the way..accusing "these IPs" of being block-evading editors is just a stupid strategy by you to divert the attention of admins away from you.143.239.7.4 (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I never met you before on any article or article discussion. Thus my questioning your motive & status. GoodDay (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

email
Please check at your earliest convenience. Thank you HJ. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 19:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much HJ. Take care. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 19:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Qsort
Where did this formerly redirect to? -- Cyber  cobra (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It redirected to C miscellaneous operations, which it seems to was deleted after an AfD. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There were a bunch more related redirects that got deleted, including swab (programming), ltoa. From my reading of WP:Speedy deletion, the criterion would only apply to implausible redirects, and since there is a fair amount of recent discussion on these pages I think they should at least be considered plausible. Anyhow, I ask if there are any previous versions of these pages that do not redirect to C miscellaneous operations, then those versions be restored instead of being completely deleted. Vadmium (talk, contribs) 07:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC).
 * I concur with this request, and/or would appreciate a list of the deleted redirects so that those with reasonable alternate targets can be retargetted. For example, qsort should quite reasonably be redirected to Quicksort rather than having been deleted entirely. Also, nice lolcat :-) -- Cyber  cobra (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * OK:


 * G8 applies to broken redirects (ie, redirects to targets that don't exist, usually because the target article has been deleted as in this case); R3 is for completely implausible redirects.
 * swab was previously a very short article before it was redirected to the now-deleted C miscellaneous operations
 * ltoa was also previously a very short article, which was redirected to C miscellaneous operations due to lack of notability.
 * Since neither was redirected as a result of a consensus decision so far as I can see, I can restore the previous stubs if you want, but I can't guranteee they won't be AfD's. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   11:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Not vandalism at We are the 99%
Please look again. There were two "References" subheadings on the page. The first held all the footnotes. The second was blank, except for the actual subheading. I removed it. You reverted my edit, so now the article looks silly again. You also issued a vandalism warning to the IP address I'm at today. At minimum, would you please self revert? If you're so moved, please delete the vandalism warning or put an explanatory note below it. Thanks. 205.201.251.230 (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Sandusky
I see you've discovered Jerry Sandusky -- my condolences. Revdel might be appropriate for a number of other recent edits. I think it's inevitable that it will need semi-protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Bloody hell. Thanks for drawing my attention to it. I've RevDel'd the grossly inappropriate edits and protected it for a couple of weeks. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

I want this deleted
User:Jakeriederer, comments here are directed at me and serve no purpose. WP:UP "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws." WP:SOAPBOX. User has also just admitted that he is a sockpuppet with 3 other accounts, you have warned him about this before. - (CK)Lakeshade  -  talk2me  - 20:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, that justifies a block. You;re welcome to start an SPI to see if a checkuser'll look for the other accounts, but if he's not bluffing, I expect they'll be obvious enough (and they'll be autoblocked anyway). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Deleted my post!!!!!
Hello, you recently deleted my post! I used correct sources and the post was relevant. You live in England how do you know what happens in South Africa?? This incedent is all over our press and media at the moment. This damaged the school! I should know I am a parent of a child who goes there!! I think you need to google things that you dont know about before you delete them. I thought wiki was a place to learn with credible sources but if you are all going to just be from another country with NO knowledge what so ever then I can safley say that wiki is a site full of ignorant information! THIS IS A SHAMBLES!!!
 * You need to provide references that prove what you're saying, especially when what you're adding could be libellous if it's not true. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Harry. I saw your protection of Justin Bieber‎ and agree with that. Although not bumping into you much these days, I did notice you WP:Iglooing around the place and its good to see you are well - best - Off2riorob (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * An unfortuante side effect of edit wars is that the semi is also removed when the full protection expires. We could do with a way of fixing that, really. But I just restored the semi with the original expiry date. I'm around, but real life is busy, and I'm on Igloo because I'm too tired to do much else! How are you? Are you going to stand for ArbCom again this year? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow - ok - don't drop out this time. As I think a bit of new blood is always a good idea and I think you would not break the arbcom, I will look at supporting you. Although I found it a great experience, and am proud to have made it to the end and appreciative for the ninety odd users that trusted me, I will not be standing again in the foreseeable future - I would like to have the ability to help with RFPP and blocking clear vandals and closing AFD discussion and other simple admin tasks like that - moving protected page requested and userfy-ing of previously deleted pages and such similar issues that are easy to do if you have a general all round level of experience, but at present with the way the system works and the way privileges are bundled together it's not on my upcoming agenda. Apart from that I am well, a bit busy in real life - a lot of new things have come into my arena recently as I move from one age to the next and start to deal with the usual issues that arise. - take it easy Harry and be happy and healthy. - Off2riorob (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Automated typo?

 * (Deletion log); 23:36:32 . . HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs | block)‎ deleted "Swab (programming)" (CSD G8: Redirect to a apge which has been deleted or which does not exist (TW))

Friendly reminder: there's a typo in your apparently auto-generated deletion summary... how did it happen?

In other news, I'll try to make it to the London meetup this Sunday, so hopefully I'll meet you there! Deryck C. 22:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Woops! It's not auto-generated, it's generated by a cack-handed admin who's had too little sleep! Twinkle put it into the deletion log, but I told it what to put there! Hopefully I'll see you on Sunday then—looks like the pub could be busy. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Druid
I cannot see how this is vandalism. The publication history section is for out-of-universe description, so I was trimming out the excess plot summary. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm going to revert this one; please, if there are any problems with this edit, discuss with me rather than throwing around baseless accusations. Thank you. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Please discuss this with me instead of robitcally issuing warnings? Please explain why you think this is vandalism? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Please, I am asking you to discuss this with me rationally. Please don't ignore me.  I am receiving warnings with no explanation of what I did wrong. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I apologise, this appears to be a mistake. I've reverted my warnings to you. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, thank you. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, apparently these aren't the druids you're looking for. :) -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 16:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh... you know, that joke has actually come up in our D&D game. ;) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Request for protection: The Beatles
Hello! I ask you to defend the contributions, related with the website beatles1.ru. Including, I ask the protection of this resolution: Permission to use materials related to The Beatles (inability to edit). The support needs to be, because some users let self illegal actions, such as vandalism, lobby, other reasons. They try to dispute the resolution of the authoritative team and provoke a war of edits. This is already evident. Reputation of the website beatles1.ru and its the owners is violated in the result of such destructive actions. The owners do not want a war of edits, they want to be calm. Thank you! This is my ID: [redacted] (Many people from different countries have the exact same settings, using the remote administration software: they have common range of IP addresses, Internet provider and so on. They risk become sock). Evgeniy - 95.31.124.213 (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC).


 * Currently, they play in war of edits, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Beatles_(album)&action=history . [redacted] - 95.31.124.213 (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC).
 * Email address redacted. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 21:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked . (Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues.....). All right in any case. To make better, can use content via educational PDF books from the website. Example: http://beatles1.ru/PDF_RUSS_FILES/Please_Please_Me_SONG_The_Beatles_RUS_Text_Video.pdf (Russian version but can make with any language in any moment). In the External links. 95.31.162.173 (talk) 14:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

How to handle editor report
Hi, you commented that this report regarding 24.23.161.104 was inactionable/stale - via which venue should the editor's actions be handled? Thanks, AV3000 (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well that report had gone unactioned for 13 hours. The average response time at AIV is under 5 minutes in my experience. Where to take it if they resume depends on whether it's effectively a difference of opinion (in which case I would try WP:DRN in the first instnace]]), or a matter of disruptive editing, but not sufficiently black and white for it to be actioned at AIV (in which case WP:ANI is probably your best bet). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

admin
Nicely said. "when I fuck up, I bloody well admit it" is just about the definition of a good SysOp, as far as I am concerned. I understand your move.  Chzz  ► 00:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

RE:AIV
I understand what you're saying, but I found it difficult to see good faith after seeing yet another unexplained genre change to Superwoman Pt. II. I thought after the final warning, he'd be a little more careful to not make the same mistake with the same article that led to his last block. Dan56 (talk) 03:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification
You might wish to see this: Sockpuppet investigations/Haploidavey. WilliamH (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That's not even worth a reply. But thanks for letting me know. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite right, and you're more than welcome. WilliamH (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

IP Vandal
This IP vandal was here yesterday and 2 days ago. This user is able to switch IP addresses.— cyberpower (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 21:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Which one? I've dealt with hundreds of IP vandals in the last couple of days a lone. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The one on the Pokemon pages. This user destroyed a lot of pages.  I believe this is one user.— cyberpower  (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 21:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh that guy; I've blocked his IP range for a week. We'll see if that has any affect. If not, I can semi-protect the page(s). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I was told by other admins that that would cause to much collateral damage. So far it's quite again. Please send TB.— cyberpower  (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 21:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It's only a small range (a few hundred IPs), but the calculation was only based on two IPs—he might have access to a larger range, and the larger the range, the greater the risk of collateral damage. It's a case of watching and waiting to see what he does next. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * He disrupted Pokemon (Anime) as well as any other page that got Semi-Protected.— cyberpower (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 21:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * From what IP to what IP did you block.— cyberpower (Talk to Me )(Contributions ) 21:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The range I blocked is 141.0.8.0/23, calculated using the two IPs with which he vandalized today. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?
 * I believe he was also on 141.0.9.xxx. The code for my signature is so long isn't it?— cyberpower  (<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Talk to Me )(<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Contributions ) 21:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm going to have to undo this, sorry but the collateral is huge, even on a /23 range. Page protection is by far the better option. WilliamH (talk) 22:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to the gym so I won't be able to fight it off if he decides to come back.— cyberpower (<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Talk to Me )(<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Contributions ) 22:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * After a fair amount of block conflicts it seems that it came out that MuZemike left the block on, but as anon only instead of hardblocked so unless the vandal finds a new IP range it's still good. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 22:29, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Guidance on "vandalism" flag
Dear HJ: I'm interim communications director for the Workmen's Circle, a Jewish nonprofit. My edits to our page today were flagged as vandalism. In fact, I'm editing an entry that's both inaccurate and outdated. I've looked at the rules and definitions around vandalism; if there's some other step we should take to manage our page legally, would appreciate your guidance. Thanks, Mkaminer (talk) 21:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Your edits were reverted because they do not adhere to a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and so presents just the facts—any embellishment or glossing over is not allowed, and the tone must be in keeping with what you would expect from an encyclopaedia, not an organisation's "about us" page. Compare, for example, Wikipedia (the encyclopaedia article on this website) and WP:About (the site's description of itself). Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Frgt/10
Wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit here as the edit you reverted appeared to be a proper redirect. Calabe1992 00:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

WP:V
OK, it looks like you, me and User:Newyorkbrad promised to close this ... would email be the best place to discuss this first? (Oh and I'm in the UK, so it's 1am here, and I'm going to bed now). Black Kite (t)  01:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That would seem sensible. I'll drop you an email so you have my email address. I'm away all weekend on Wikimedia UK business (mostly) though, so I won't be able to seriously look over the RfC until Monday afternoon at the earliest. I didn't know you were a Brit, but if you can make it to London on Sunday afternoon, I'll buy you a pint at the meetup.  HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

I might need your help in the future - is that ok?
We met in Manchester?>> Lindsey Ellevb78 (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

New relations related to The Beatles
Hello. Grand master decided to try begin normal relations again. I am helper and we use remote administration software. See: http://beatles1.ru/audio. He disagree about licensing of stream, however. Please, write your reply here. - 95.29.84.132 (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC).


 * Take: http://liveweb.archive.org/http://beatles1.ru/ . All for people and free. - 95.29.84.132 (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC).
 * You're missing the point. The music is copyrighted. The copyright is held by either the band or the record company. You do not have the rights to distribute it, much less under a Creative Commons license. You can only release your own work, and distribute work which has already been explicitly released. Whether your use of copyrighted material qualifies as fair use or not is a matter for you, but we cannot use it on Wikipedia, because we apply a deliberately much higher standard than the law does because our goals include the promotion of free content (that is, content that has been released under a suitable license by the copyright holder—simply stating it is licensed as CC-By-SA does not make it so, especially when it is owned by a third party who would be extremely reluctant to release it under a free license because that would remove their opportunities to make money from it. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * This is Evgeniy. I not have of any relation to your quarrel with helper. I made rollback. Trust other people, to regret, is a mistake often. Any issue can be decided by peace way. Please, explain me, that I must to do. I can give password for any user, who can create more lawful grounds at the website. The common website, I spoke already. Really, your resolution lets to publish materials. What happened? I suggest such option: to put only one link to the website beatles1.ru. At the article The Beatles. Your opinion? By the way, in accordance with rules of the Wikipedia, is allowed to put link in the section External links, when the material has encyclopedic nature, even if exist some small problems related to copyright. At us no problems almost (otherwise, you could say "no" for my permission, when was sent request). It is logical. We try for people. This is common goal. Nobody looking for profit for self. By the way, here exist people who make lobby for EMI and Apple Corps. I watched this. These people think about commercial interests, but interests of poor (who not have of money) people for them are not actual. The problem is really exists currently, because was changed limit (of fall to the public domain). 20 years else. Not fair. - 89.179.25.127 (talk) 05:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC).
 * Life ain't fair, but our rules are here for a reason. We don't promote content just so someone can get free songs or something.  We don't break copyrights because the big, mean companies need to play nice with others.  Those big, mean companies make millions every year on The Beatles and would crush Wikipedia in a heartbeat if they were to find copyrighted content on our site from The Beatles.  Because of that, we aren't going to post any links to sites where their songs can be obtained and we aren't going to allow their songs to be uploaded to the site.  Just ain't happening.  Like I said, life ain't fair. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 07:10, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Why took permission? 78.106.157.9 (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Found super option. Will soon say for public. 78.106.157.9 (talk) 14:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * (Just passing through) Unless you are looking to get yourself banished for disruptive editing, I highly recommend not carrying on this discussion any further or making any further attempts to place copyrighted content on Wikipedia.  Both HJ and Neutralhomer above have provided the reasoning behind the disallowance to do this and you are not listening.  You need to listen before you get yourself into a copyright battle you can't control.  CycloneGU (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * You wrong. Idea: to use fair use. Video is a small part of very large movie, in basic. Exist several grounds to use such way. Education: e-books with info and a small part of very large movie inside ... and so on. Science: collect of statistics (50 years !!!!) and so on. Culture: the largest ground. We want give The Beatles for all the world, we are limited of small parts of very large movies. Charity: millions of people can not buy disc (no money). We promote different international acts related to culture and rights of people. We not substitute, but create (educational books for example). Million of other grounds. Not exist specific interpretations. Read: http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html . Especially for you can put a box for comments. You also can give name fool for Ringo. And so on. You have mixed with dirt CC + protocol http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CCPlus . Protocol is used by the Senate (even Waiver !!!!!) http://wiki.creativecommons.org/New_York_State_Senate . This alone is enough to not worry. You have discredited the government of the U. S. . You have discredited the licenses of the CC (you do not believe them) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en . Only small file - nothing more (now this viewed for everybody). You can only make attribution in the relation of photos of small boys. You not independent. This case is disgrace for big number of structures Wikimedia and the CC. The power of OPENESS? The power for stupid toys only. Journalists love such facts. Wikipedia has shown its true face. Wikipedia and Kaltura rob owners with HTML 5. Public domain via CC0. I can continue... How about fair use ? 78.106.157.9 (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you are wrong. It doesn't matter if it is a second's worth of a movie with no audio, in black-and-white, upside-down...it is still copyright material.  There is zero ways around this.  It doesn't matter what you want to give to the world, you can NOT do it here with copyright material.  Not going to happen.  Wikipedia's rules are higher than those of CC and those of the US Government, because we set outselves to a higher standard.  There isn't a fair-use claim here either.  Stop now with the disruptive editing and trying to go around our rules.  If you continue, you will be blocked. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 20:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I also feel the need to add something to this. Mr. IP, you claim your fair use is for charity for the millions unable to buy the disc.  People nowadays are less likely to buy the disc unless they are collectors.  Rather, they will now buy MP3s, which are easily made available with no fuss.  And to the point of this reply, to quote someone I know, "We are not a charity organization."  CycloneGU (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Good Morning (Afternoon by your Clock)
Might need to enlist your help for a quick moment if you agree with my thoughts here.

Heavenly Christmas used to circularly redirect to Jackie Evancho discography as it was not a notable release at the time. Now that it's come out and charted, it's notable and has an article. That's all fine and dandy. My only issue was that my advice to use Heavenly Christmas was bypassed (in error I'm sure, being new probably didn't understand what I meant) and the article instead got a newly created location of Heavenly Christmas (Jackie Evancho). No other article exists for an album of this name, I think (Ssilvers happened to note another in the Billboard 200 that is not, well, "articled"), so is it wrong for me to think it should go right at Heavenly Christmas and, if another is needed with that title someday, we can move things around at that time? It would be pointless NOT to have that title used for something, I believe, but it will someday be a DAB (which would then provide the option for Heavenly Christmas (Jackie Evancho album), a more appropriate title than the one used); for now, with only one related article, it should be the article.

If I am right in my thinking, I'll need the Heavenly Christmas redirect deleted and merged with the article at Heavenly Christmas (Jackie Evancho) (which I've helped in editing at the current location for now) moved to the newly opened and moved to the former location. I don't believe I can move an article on top of the redirect thing and am trying to avoid copy-and-paste editing. =) CycloneGU (talk) 16:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I happened to pop back in the second you merged them, I think. Thanks.  If a DAB is needed in the future, I will not object to the current home becoming a DAB and the article moving again then. =)  CycloneGU (talk) 23:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * (ec) Done. Just for future reference, all I need to know is what I'm moving where. Deleting the redirect is one more click than you have to make to move a page, and undeleting the history (in cases where significant edits have been made that require attribution) is two more clicks—nothing too challenging, but because the only way to get rid of the redirect is to delete it, you have to be an admin to do it. it gets trickier when there are significant edits in multiple places, but this kind of thing is straightforward. :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

chuffed!
Hey Harry, thank you so much for the barnstar! It was great to meet you and Rexx yesterday and I am definitely glad you were both there. The whole thing would have been lost without you. I really wish I could be free enough to attend Sue Gardner's talk in London tonight, and thanks for the invitation to the London meet-up, too. Hopefully I'll be able to make it to the next one!  Julia \talk 14:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You're more than welcome. Sue's talk was very interesting, but the meetup was very busy. The next one should be a little quieter—it's on 11 December, which unfortunately is right after the Manchester meetup. I'll be at Manchester, since Rexx has offered me a lift, but I'm not sure about London. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Move request
Could you please move Zeff Post Doctoral Fellows to Zeff Follows? An IP user who claims to be Zeff Fellows is requesting the page be moved there. Through investigation, I believe he has proven himself sufficiently enough to grant this request. Please send a TB.— cyberpower (<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Talk to Me )(<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Contributions ) 22:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

J. Herbert Cooke
Hi HJ. The redirect you deleted was a genuine one for a South Australian politician on an article I was developing in userspace. I should have attached a comment to that effect, if not mea culpa, many apologies. Could you please consider reverting it? Many thanks. Doug butler (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Odd. I deleted it because it was on a database report of redirects red links, but the target article appears to be very much in existence. I've restored it, anyway. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It was a redlink when I created it, and took article out of userspace the following day. Thanks for the fix. Doug butler (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Another one of Madden NFL 21's socks


I found another one of his socks as he was logging into the account. Please block the sock; I will probably be hit by the autoblock, but IPBE should fix that. Cheers, — mc10 ( t / c ) 19:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked, thanks. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

deletion of page for C++ Function ITOA - Was that really necessary?
I noticed today after a browser restart that the page I had open on the programming function ITOA was missing. I happened to actually have been in the midst of learning something off of that, so thanks. I don't know if you deleted it because it wasn't referenced from/to other articles, or perhaps it just wasn't notable enough to you, but it's gone and this comment is about all the more I can do about it. Thought you might (not) like to know. 99bluefoxx (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That apge has never been deleted, much less by me. Is that the right link? If not, could you see fi you can find the right one and I'll look into it. The chances are it was a broken redirect (I don't derlete much else at the minute), in which case your beef is probably with the admin who delted the apge it redirected to rahter than with me. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Blocking request
User talk:Starrahul reverted AfD tag and other tags while discussion is still in process (see here)  of article Trimbakrao Bapurao Bhoite Inamdar, a page he has created. Although, I have reverted the edits using twinkle and put a message on his page warning him not do do this again. On his talk page I found that he had been blocked previously also for similar reasons. As you are an Admin, whose name I found on his page, I am writing to you. I request you to please either warn him or block him for some days a further warning. I am not aware where to appeal for blocking so writing you in good faith. Thanks. Jethwarp (talk) 15:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

at least as of this time stamp, the user has not edited. further warnings without him/her editing would not be warranted, in my opinion. (@ jethwarp). Syrthiss (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * They did it once and haven't edited since. Blocking now would accompliosh less than nothing, and would only be an option worthy of consideration if they persisted in removing the tag. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your User Page.
I must agree with Microbox. The flag is a nuisance and so are all the icons when comparing revisions. I recommend they be moved some place else.— cyberpower (<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Talk to Me )(<span style="color:; font-family:arnprior">Contributions ) 10:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it's HIS userpage. Don't look if you don't want to. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * With Bwilkins on this one. His userpage, his rules.  Kinda like his house, his rules.  If he wants the stars there (which actually I created...thank you very much), he is more than allowed.  If you don't like it, there is a "random article" link to the left and a "sign out" link at the top right you can click at anytime. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 11:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Martin, I appreciate the gesture. :) They certainly are important, and it's great that it looks like we'll be doing more of them in the future. It would be nice to hold something like that in your neck of the woods (much as I like the north). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Much appreciated. Cheers! ;) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   04:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Unblock on hold
There is an unblock request at User talk:Oakley77. I am inclined to give the editor another chance, but do you have any comment? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Tehy seem sincere, and re-blocks are easy enough if necessary, so why not. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Re C++ function ITOA
The discussion here was recently archived, but the answer may lie somewhere in Articles for deletion/Stdlib.h. HTH --RexxS (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Otis Redding
hello,

I found your name on WP:PRV; the article Otis Redding needs a copyedit. I think it is near FA-status, so it is possible to bring this at the end of November to FAC. -- ♫GoP♫ TCN 12:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Ina Raymundo
I substantially rewritten the one-line article Ina Raymundo originally created by User:John Abento. Can you please send me a copy of my edits? I'll try to expand it further. Thanks. --Bluemask (talk) 05:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies; the guy was blocked for creating a series of hoaxes and many of them were up for deletion so I just removed them all. I missed the background in that case. If there are any others you'd like restoring, don't hesitate to ask. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?
 * Thanks for the restore. As for the other deleted articles, those can be written from scratch when proven as not hoaxes. Most of them are unreferenced stubs anyway. --Bluemask (talk) 12:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision deletion
I see that you deleted this edit from Talk:World. However, you left the following edit in place, so that the content you attempted to remove still remained in the article. I have deleted it, but I thought it worth warning you, so you can avoid the same mistake again. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Likewise with Talk:Chadli Bendjedid. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't even know what the contents said; I just assumed, given the edit summaries, that it was nothing pleasant. But thanks for letting me know; I'll try to remember to check the history more carefully next time. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:31, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Favour
Hey again, could you possibly merge User:JuneGloom07/April Scott with April Scott (Home and Away)? - JuneGloom    Talk  23:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, done. Is there anything in the deleted history that needs restoring for attribution purposes? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, I don't think so. - JuneGloom    Talk  00:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey HJ, please may you do the same for me with User:Raintheone/Bianca Scott and Bianca Scott? Rain the One  BAM 01:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You were lucky enough to catch me just as I was on my way to bed (via a few AfDs that need closing!). :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I'm glad I managed to - thankyou for your help with that. :) Rain the One  BAM 01:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Any time! HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Your assistance please...
Could you please userify Trent A. Aistrope?

The article is on my watchlist, but I didn't see the prod. Standards have evolved. If I started this article I may agree it doesn't merit inclusion, by today's standards. However I would like to take a look. If I agree it doesn't measure up I'll apply a db-author. Geo Swan (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well it's a PROD, so you can more-or-less do what you want with it. If you want to keep it, it will only be deleted through AfD, but it's up to you—let me know what you want to do. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * My pleasure. Thanks for the barnstar. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

RFA nomination request
Hello! I saw your name at WP:REQUESTNOM, and I would appreciate if you could take a look at my edits and tell me if you think I am ready for RFA or not. Most of my edits are content-related, but I've heard that Wikipedia needs more administrators so I figured I would look into RFA. If I am not ready, could you please tell me what I need to do to become ready? Thank you, --Cerebellum (talk) 15:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I have a question about your rationale
I'll grant I was a participant in the discussion, but I can't agree with your close on Articles for deletion/Hero's 10. To my eyes this was a clear delete. One long time editor, one new account, and two ips made essentially the identical argument, that a body of notable participants constitutes a notable event. Can you point out the policy or guideline with which this agrees? The nominator did respond with the model reply to the argument: notable participants don't necessarily make an event notable. In previous MMA and kickboxing deletion procedures, this argument has proved unpersuasive precisely because the assertion is not a criteria of WP:EVENT. I'll concede big events tend to make key participants notable, but the converse is not even an essay, much less a guideline or policy. Especially because of the enormous amount of socking and ip promotion typically involved in these combat event page deletion procedures, this outcome is disappointing. BusterD (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * disclosure, BusterD contacted me. I agree with BusterD, none of the keep votes demonstrated WP:SPORTSEVENT was met. LibStar (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * AfD requires a consensus to delete, and in cases that aren't clear-cut, that requires thorough discussion of the arguments. That just didn't happen in this case, and so no consensus was reached. As I said in my closing statement, you're welcome to re-nominate it after a suitable grace period (a few weeks) in the hope that a more thorough discussion can be had. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Need assistance regarding a user who continues to troll Cung Le articles
Hi, I just wanted to know if you can help edit or help me contact someone regarding a specific user who refuses to acknowledge any proof that I have provided regarding a recent error by the UFC.

The specific user in question is Glock17gen4. His only evidence is a picture based on a mistake by UFC production, where MMA fighter Cung Le has already responded that he did not know about, yet Glock17gen4 refuses to accept that and continues to revert Cung Le's Nationality as a current Vietnamese national.

I have provided significant proof in both discussions at the UFC 139 and Cung Le's articles. Please take a look. Cung Le has acknowledged both his American nationality and his Vietnamese heritage (especially with the 3 striples flag which represents the fallen Saigon). I hope you can help. Both his website at CungLe.com and UFC.com profile describe him as a Vietnamese-American and he quoted as calling himself an American Wushu champion. Glock17gen4 seems to not understand the differences between Nationality and Ethnicity. He continues to only use that one picture as his proof. PinoyFilAmPride (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I will help you with this and assess the situation. — cyberpower ( Talk to Me )( Contributions ) 00:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Need you to weigh in on something
Guy just isn't getting something here, I don't know any other way to explain it. •  GunMetal Angel   00:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Outreach!

 * Thanks, Rexx. This partnership of you running the teaching while I handle the administrative side seems to be be working well. I couldn't have done it without you. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Second Liverpool Wikimeet
Hi Harry, it was good to meet you yesterday. Hope you got home safely. As discussed, I suggest that we hold the next Liverpool Wikimeet (and I'm hoping that there will be another) at the Richard John Blackler pub (a.k.a. Wetherspoons) on the corner of Elliot Street and Great Charlotte Street. It's an easy walk from the station, is youngster friendly, has wi-fi, serves food and (most importantly) proper beer. As for when, I would suggest late January or February, probably a weekend. What do you reckon? Do you want to do the page or shall I? Cheers, Bazonka (talk) 08:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent! The two main criteria are that it accommodates under 18s (none turned up last night, but just in case any might want to come to future meetups) and that it serves proper beer! I don't think the pub we were in last night had seen a good beer in a long time! For dates, a Saturday is probably best, and not the second weekend of the month because that clashes with the London meetup. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What about 1pm, 28 January? Bazonka (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That seems sensible. I'll create the page for a it later on, unless you want to do it? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm quite happy for you to do it. Thanks, Bazonka (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

WiFi at London Wikimania
Hi HJ Mitchell,

I dunno if you've seen my post on WiFi here but I thought you might be able to contribute. Yaris678 (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I hadn't seen it yet. I use the recent changes feed like a watchlist on the Wikimedia UK wiki, but I've only just logged on today. :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No probs. Yaris678 (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Hero's 10
I ask that you take another look at Articles for deletion/Hero's 10, which you just closed, as well as the related Articles for deletion/SuperKombat (2nd nomination), which is still open. As with the latter AfD, the one that you have closed has been tainted by multiple !voting among IPs and registered users (which I cannot make that connection per the WMF Privacy Policy). At a minimum those two "keep" !votes from those IPs in that AfD should be discounted and the consensus reassessed. –MuZemike 18:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough; I've amended the result to delete. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)