User talk:HKPsychologist

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

HKPsychologist, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong Association of Doctors in Clinical Psychology


A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Association of Doctors in Clinical Psychology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Psychologist, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000  01:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice about sourcing
It's preferrable to use secondary sources for all material that's added to the articles. That's why I've been removing your posts. Please find a newspaper or other source other than the association itself as a reference for your material. Seems a bit promotional to be adding this material to multiple articles. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000  14:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I had the same concern. If the organization is notable enough for its own article (so create the article first), it may deserve mention in some other articles, but even then, such mention or wikilinking should be done appropriately, without any promotional aspects. -- Brangifer (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)