User talk:HRAPSU

License tagging for File:PolyphosphazeneGeneralStructure.png
Thanks for uploading File:PolyphosphazeneGeneralStructure.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Check this out
Nice to see some edits on polyphosphazene but be aware of WP:COI. Self citation seems to be the main incentive for academics contributing to Wikipedia. I hope that you prove me wrong. Please also be aware of the guideline in WP:SECONDARY - yes, Wikipedia needs some primary references, but the preference is for secondary citations - reviews and books since these sources have undergone greater scrutiny and analysis. You can make your PR campaign more subtle and more useful by switching to such general sources. You can always have an appendix with your detailed publications. My guess is that tens of thousands of publications appear annually in the chemical literature - so it is tricky to cite all journal articles, you would agree. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your note. I do indeed hope that you can exchange some of the specific references to more general sources.  There are many places within Wikipedia where your expertise would be welcome, ideally without always referring to your own primary publications.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:42, 29 June 2012 (UTC)