User talk:HRDingwall

Proposed deletion of Normality (roleplaying game)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Normality (roleplaying game), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Defenestration has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Hús ö  nd  01:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of King Of The Pirates
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article King Of The Pirates, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Not notable, see Notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Eve Hall (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lung (cannabis)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lung (cannabis), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NOTMANUAL and, if you remove the manual-esque parts, then fails WP:DICDEF. Any search for the term is exceedingly frustrated by the fact that there are numerous mentions of concerns about marijuana's effect on the lungs, etc.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tyrenon (talk) 02:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lung (cannabis)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lung (cannabis), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be non-notable slang. Attempts to confirm either way frustrated by the large number of articles concerning marijuana and lung cancer/respiratory illnesses.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tyrenon (talk) 04:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Яolcats
Please do not keep adding this to the Lolcat article without discusion. I already gave a reason (here) why it should not be included; if you believe the link should be included, please go to Talk:Lolcat and explain why. Continuing to replace the link after it has been removed could be a form of edit warring. Thank you, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 22:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of F.A.T.A.L. (role-playing game)
I have nominated F.A.T.A.L. (role-playing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/F.A.T.A.L. (role-playing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  RGTraynor  15:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barmy Jeffers


The article Barmy Jeffers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable fictional character from work that doesn't have its own WP article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 01:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Barmy Jeffers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barmy Jeffers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barmy Jeffers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 01:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)