User talk:HRS IAM

{|cellpadding=18 style="background-color:white; " {{User:HRS_IAM/ST|ocol=1 Welcome, newcomer!
 * sectiontitle=Welcome to the Wikipedia
 * comment=

Here are some useful tips to ...

...Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkSoul 04:42, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I'm not a newcomer ... but thanks anyway
Originally, I started creating and editing articles on here before most of the admins started on wikipedia. I quit wiki for a while due to junk that I did not think was appropriate from other editors. But little did I know, I was receieving junk from admins, power hungry types, not the helpful kind.

First, if you tangle with me for any reason, expect that I will not immediately reply. Because I do not make the mistakes you just made, you know who you are. And I will freely tell you about it so that everyone can see.

My POV is this way because, after bullying tactics I quit wiki editing. I came back on after a many year cool down period, and began rediting, only to find vindication, that those who were bugging me were bugging others and subsequently banned. I have never been banned, nor will I be suckered into an edit war.

You should also note, and you know who you are, I don't consider my edit as written in stone and cherish the people that correct my or anybody's additions in a constructive manner. But don't expect me to be a push-over in the face of Policy.

Oh, if you are the freight-train type, I will step in front of you and knock you off your tracks, especially if I think you are railroading another editor. But other than that, have a nice day, and consider looking before you leap. - Hard Raspy Sci }}


 * }
 * }

Tornado myths
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tornado myths, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Tornado myths. Superm401 - Talk 16:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I didn't realize this had been submitted to AFD before.  I've removed the prod. Superm401 - Talk 16:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Mpemba effect
Like you, I am somewhat sceptical of the Mpemba effect, for which there seems to be scant evidence. It seems something of an urban myth to me. Martin Hogbin (talk) 13:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)