User talk:HSchnyder

Stop disrupting and offending
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Hesemann, you may be blocked from editing.

personal offenses such as here and in discussions about this lemma dozens of times before are unacceptable. Maximilian (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. ''The summary in question is here. If you make another legal threat, you may be blocked from editing. Also, you've been mentioned at the Administrators' noticeboard for Incidents.'' gwickwire  talk edits 23:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

AIV - making legal threats
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Dawn Bard (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Michael Hesemann shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Just to make sure that you know (now) that edit-warring is wrong, even if you're right (which has yet to be determined). Drmies (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)