User talk:HU55EIN

June 2010
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chuck Schumer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The addition of the fact that both Muslims and Christians do indeed believe in the Torah and in King David is not editorializing it is required to show why his comment is worthy of being added to his page. He suggested that the Palestinians of Gaza be strangulated economically because they do not be believe in the Torah and in King David. He added that they do not believe in Israel's right to exist BUT that is not controversial nor worthy of addition to any politicians page because almost all politicians in the US accuse Hamas and Gazans incorrectly of having such views when the polls show otherwise. But this is not what the issue with Mr. Schumer. I have never previously heard that someone justifies the ***Economic Strangulation*** of a millions and a half innocent people based on whether they religiously believe or don't believe in what he sees as important. ALSO, the worst part about it which NEEDS to be highlighted and explained is that his accusation were factually incorrect and that is WHY I added the context (not editorializing) that Muslims and Christians do actually believe in both the Torah and in King David and made sure that both the Torah and King David are linked to their respective pages on Wikipedia so you and others can confirm the context given to his remarks and clearly show that he was WRONG. Please STOP calling it editorializing and POV when it is needed to make sense of why it was wrong of him to say it and the factual mistakes he made. To be a team player I removed the word *shocking* and changed the siege to a blockade as per your wish. I hope that you refrain from trying to fit this incident to your own POV and try to white wash a religious based racist inhumane remark as a run of the mill casual and accepted opinion when it is clearly not. .:HU§§EIN:. 06:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Muslim Zionism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ''Any material added must be cited to a reliable source. This is Wikipedia policy. Please note that this doesn't necessarily mean that your facts are wrong; You can re-add them with citations to reliable sources.'' Marokwitz (talk) 07:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)