User talk:HVPENFT

Welcome!
Hello, HVPENFT, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:HVPENFT, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 12:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HVPENFT


A tag has been placed on User:HVPENFT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 12:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --HVPENFT (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC) Its based on the truth and does not have any advertisement in it, I tried to leave that our that's why you don't see company names and the name of the blockchain project.


 * A topic must meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable topic to be considered worthy of inclusion. This means the article's subject must have already received significant coverage in multiple sources that are considered reliable and independent of the subject. In the case of an article about a person, these criteria are further refined in Wikipedia's notability criteria for people and its policy for biographies of living persons.


 * A reliable source is a source with an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. This heavily favours mainstream news, academic press, and reputable publishers of books, newspapers and magazines. Self-published sources like social media (including Twitter) have no editorial oversight and are therefore disqualified - unless they are the official account of an existing reliable source (e.g. BBC). All you have given us for sources is one Twitter link, which is unacceptable.


 * Therefore, unless this person has already received press coverage from multiple third-party sources, then he is undeserving of a Wikipedia article until he acquires such coverage. In the meantime, writing about him on Wikipedia will be considered using it for publicity, which is not allowed here. You can't use Wikipedia to gain notability; you have to be already notable to merit an article.


 * As well, if you are this person, then please do not write about yourself. Wikipedia strongly discourages writing autobiographies and cautions that an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. If you are not this person, but have a personal or professional affiliation with him, then you have conflict of interest; and if you are being paid to write about him, then you have to follow Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure policy.


 * Writing new articles on Wikipedia is one of the most difficult tasks a new user can try. It is better to start out with smaller edits to existing article to gain some experience with Wikipedia's rules and editing culture. Please follow some of the links in the Welcome message above to learn about how to properly contribute to the project. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions regarding blockchain and cryptocurrency topics
--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)