User talk:HY-PW1

Welcome!
Hello, HY-PW1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hydropower (wave/tidal), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Laber□T 20:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Hydropower (wave/tidal)


The article Hydropower (wave/tidal) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Copyright infringement, articles on this topic already exist afaik

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laber□T 20:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Why has this page been proposed to deletion?
this is for a university assignment, could you please wait until next Monday to delete it? were going to be evaluated through the weekend and we really just need the teacher to check the content. Sorry to bother and kindest regards, HY-PW1 (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Carolina (HY-PW1)


 * Firstly, there were still copyright issues with significant parts copy-pasted from external websites in violation of copyright. Secondly, we already have articles on both wave power and tide power, and I rather don't think combining those into a third article confers any benefit. Thirdly, large parts of your article are unreferenced and arguably promotional. Particularly the first issue requires us to delete the page, but the second means we likely shouldn't have another article on the topic in the first place, and the third means that even without the other issues, this likely wouldn't be appropriate as an encyclopedia article without significant work. Huon (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hydropower (wave/tidal)


The article Hydropower (wave/tidal) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is a clear copyvio, I didn't speedy it only because I couldn't find the source, I am assuming it's the linked book. Given that you can see footnotes from the original, it's an obvious copy. To the extent there's any salvagable content it belongs either in the main Hydropower article, or the Renewable Energy article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at WP:EXT, you are linking things incorrectly in your article. See also WP:CITE and WP:CITEFOOT for how to place references correctly.  Please note if you're linking large portions of your content back to another article, it likely doesn't need to be duplicated. JamesG5 (talk) 09:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)