User talk:HYang2024/Inclusive design

The lead is strong providing the beginnings to a great and concise definition of the articles topic, the lead could include some discussion of the accessible versus universal design, as the article discusses this at length. The structure of the article, as well, is incredibly clear making the information more digestible. However, the section of examples of innovative design could come sooner in the article to provide readers with more context. The sources are all very reliable and the article provides a wide range of sources. This article maintains neutrality and simply presents the information to the reader. Some information included in the article seems frivolous and unnecessary to the main goal of the article which is explaining innovative design.Charlottespohler (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)