User talk:HZ258

March 2018
Hello, I'm LongLiveMusic. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rangasthalam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rangasthalam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. StewdioMACK (talk) 05:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Officer (2018 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kaala (2018 film), you may be blocked from editing. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Same with this. We're not interested in editor opinions. Any attempt to summarise critical or commercial response must be directly attributed to a reliable published source. No exceptions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Last warning re: this. It's not your job to summarise a film's critical response unless you happen to be an established film aggregation website like Rotten Tomatoes, which I don't think you are. Also "critical acclaim from critics" is redundant. It would be sloppy to write this even if you could prove it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC) For these: "...to rave reviews from critics", "Blockbuster". Obviously you don't seem to understand that your opinions don't belong in articles, and that's a problem. And even if you were to provide references for the claims, we're not interested in exaggerated language that drools over article subjects. We care about neutral tone that represents the general opinion of multiple sources. "Blockbuster, super hit, failure, flop, disaster, rave reviews, universal acclaim, panned by critics," are all exaggerated wording that do not belong in an encyclopedia.

Additionally, you should not be making changes to financial data unless you are familiar with the sources the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia considers reliable. Andhra Box Office is not generally considered reliable, because it is a faceless blog run by unknown parties. See WP:ICTF for a general list of acceptable and unacceptable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * For this unsourced summary of critical response, and your continued silence on the matter. As noted multiple times, your personal opinions do not belong in articles. If you choose to file an unblock request, be prepared to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand why you have been blocked, as well as provide a plan for how you'll avoid the behavior in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)